Yeah, me too. I find it difficult to believe that many members of the public would have known about the diagnosis. Out of those few, we're then expected to believe that someone thought "oh hey, the country should hear about this asap!" whilst apparently never once giving thought to the family's right to privacy and sensitivity, despite supposedly having gone through the same experience?
The original story kicking about was that Rebekah Brooks phoned with news of the story before the Browns even knew of the diagnosis themselves. IDK if that is actually true, but it's so awful.
Yeah, wasn't it that the Browns knew, but it hadn't been 100% confirmed yet? Either way, it's appalling, literally jaw-dropping stuff. It's just malicious taunting, because there's no way that story wasn't going to get published once they had it.
Although I suppose Rebekah was really on holiday or something. Obviously the Grauniad hired someone to pretend to be her on the phone. They'll stop at nothing to undermine the good name of News International!!!
There's absolutely no excuse for that one. What did anyone have to gain from that other than causing even more distress to a couple in their darkest time? Ugh, I'm getting all worked up and ragey again!
Although I suppose Rebekah was really on holiday or something. Obviously the Grauniad hired someone to pretend to be her on the phone. They'll stop at nothing to undermine the good name of News International!!!
( ... )
Reply
I have been loling at most of it but this actually got to me. Damn you, S*n
Reply
Hmm. Hmm.
Reply
The original story kicking about was that Rebekah Brooks phoned with news of the story before the Browns even knew of the diagnosis themselves. IDK if that is actually true, but it's so awful.
Reply
Although I suppose Rebekah was really on holiday or something. Obviously the Grauniad hired someone to pretend to be her on the phone. They'll stop at nothing to undermine the good name of News International!!!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
actually lmao
Reply
Leave a comment