Conservative Group Removes Slavery Line from "Marriage Vow" Pledge

Jul 12, 2011 00:31

Conservative Group Removes Slavery Line from "Marriage Vow" Pledge

After public outcry about a line in their "Marriage Vow" pledge that made controversial claims about African American children perhaps being better off during slavery, the Family Leader apparently decided to drop that line over the weekend.The conservative group's vow, which ( Read more... )

conservatives, the tea party is not racist!, how to win friends and influence people

Leave a comment

Comments 73

chicaintcheap July 11 2011, 15:47:37 UTC
lol at "can be misconstrued". How about "offensive and ignorant as fuck"?

Reply


applegnat July 11 2011, 15:51:41 UTC
Any negative feelings. I see.

Reply


salienne July 11 2011, 15:54:03 UTC
I find it really telling that Bachmann and Santorum signed it with this line still there. (And will continue to harshly judge anyone who signs it even with the line gone.)

Reply


poetic_pixie_13 July 11 2011, 15:54:44 UTC
I'm sure the Family Leader, Bachmann and Santorum still don't see what's wrong with that line. Note how they say that the line can be misconstrued, not that the line itself is racist, disgusting bullshit. They still think it's true, just don't want the headache of defending it.

Reply

sephirajo July 11 2011, 16:04:56 UTC
Don't you know? They're such progressively MORAL and RESPONSIBLE people. Such people could NEVER be racist dipsticks. /sarcasm mode

The sarcasm out of me, I agree with this.

Reply

thelilyqueen July 11 2011, 16:20:00 UTC
Precisely. I don't think their attitudes (assitudes?) have changed one bit; they just are finding it politic to do some damage control.

Reply


chasingtides July 11 2011, 15:56:53 UTC
I don't understand why conservatives think "two parent household" is inherently better than any other family structure ( ... )

Reply

poetic_pixie_13 July 11 2011, 16:07:17 UTC
And I don't see why, even if you couldn't understand it, you would pull out this racist fuckery.

I just see it as old-school colonialism and White Man's Burden. They have to 'raise up' those unruly black and brown people, whose disproportionate rates of poverty and crime are due to things like single-parent households (which are horrible and wrong and anti-apple pie). In some twisted way it's their method of addressing the issues that exist within these communities, instead of looking at a deeply racist society and traps of poverty and history.

Reply

popehippo July 11 2011, 16:12:55 UTC
^^^

Reply

salienne July 11 2011, 17:33:31 UTC
This is a really good analysis.

It also points to how simplistic their reading of current societal struggles is, and the fact that this sort of warped reading is considered a mainstream view is terrifying.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up