Well to start with.... I don't think it took them two years before they noticed the ~confession. Plus there's this:
In April 2019, during Durst's trial, a transcript from the series revealed that Durst's final remarks had been edited and presented out of order. According to the transcript filed in court, Durst's complete remarks were as follows:
"[Unintelligible] I don't know what you expected to get. I don't know what's in the house. Oh, I want this. Killed them all, of course. [Unintelligible] I want to do something new. There's nothing new about that. [Inaudible - possibly "disaster."] He was right. I was wrong. The burping. I'm having difficulty with the question. What the hell did I do?"
Not only did he hold onto the confession for 2 years.... he apparently cut it and rearranged the sentences to make it seem even more damningthan it already was.
He DID say "that's you, you're caught" tho, which was much more damning to me than anything else, since "killed them all, of course" could have been him being facetious. But the "welp, you got caught, buddy" to himself is pretty much done and dusted.
PS I am not defending Jareki here, I also think he's super sus. I just meant I still feel like what he said was an admission, even though it was edited. If that makes sense?
I was surprised that his defence team didn’t advise him of that actually, to claim that he was saying it sarcastically or something? Instead for some reason he just completely made up that what he actually said was that they’ll think I killed them all of course, which was then very easily and quickly disproven by the prosecution playing back the audio
Jarecki is totally untrustworthy. The hackjob he did with Capturing the Friedmans makes me especially angry as it was done in a disservice to the victims.
Jarecki was very involved in trying to appeal Jesse Friedman's conviction and his bias imo colours the documentary in its attempt at making the entire story appear ambiguous. Victims and their families have questioned Jarecki's omission of the third defendant who pled guilty from the documentary, as well as JF's admissions of guilt in public. Jarecki himself admits to not reaching out to many victims and puts the onus on their addresses having changed, but notably the victims he avoided are the ones who claim they weren't coerced into reporting the Friedmans.
Despite his story that he just wanted to make a documentary about clowns and stumbled onto a bigger story it really feels like he went into this whole thing with a position he wanted to prove and was willing to bend and edit whatever he came across to do so. Ironically the appeal he helped push for led to an extensive report that affirmed JF's guilt, though they've FOI requested it under the claim it was also botched against him.
Click to view
Andrew doesn't sit well with me at all tho.
Reply
Reply
In April 2019, during Durst's trial, a transcript from the series revealed that Durst's final remarks had been edited and presented out of order. According to the transcript filed in court, Durst's complete remarks were as follows:
"[Unintelligible] I don't know what you expected to get. I don't know what's in the house. Oh, I want this. Killed them all, of course. [Unintelligible] I want to do something new. There's nothing new about that. [Inaudible - possibly "disaster."] He was right. I was wrong. The burping. I'm having difficulty with the question. What the hell did I do?"
Not only did he hold onto the confession for 2 years.... he apparently cut it and rearranged the sentences to make it seem even more damningthan it already was.
Reply
PS I am not defending Jareki here, I also think he's super sus. I just meant I still feel like what he said was an admission, even though it was edited. If that makes sense?
Reply
Reply
He edited Robert Durst's famous admission of guilt, and he held onto the footage of it for a long time instead of giving it to the authorities.
Reply
Reply
Haven't heard the tea about this, what happened? I saw that doc and was shocked by how dark it was.
Reply
Despite his story that he just wanted to make a documentary about clowns and stumbled onto a bigger story it really feels like he went into this whole thing with a position he wanted to prove and was willing to bend and edit whatever he came across to do so. Ironically the appeal he helped push for led to an extensive report that affirmed JF's guilt, though they've FOI requested it under the claim it was also botched against him.
Reply
Leave a comment