Pitchfork Does That Thing Where They Try To Correct Their Mistakes to Maintain Credibility

Oct 05, 2021 21:38


Anything to add? https://t.co/E244O83ZxI
- Pitchfork (@pitchfork) October 6, 2021

Pitchfork has gone back and re-reviewed 19 albums to rescore them. Some scores went up (way up) and others down.

According to Pitchfork:

These adjustments are born out of conversations we have all the time here on staff, much like the conversations you, our dear ( Read more... )

lana del rey, prince, grimes, the strokes, music / musician, review, daft punk, charli xcx

Leave a comment

Comments 142

doriiansz October 6 2021, 02:37:48 UTC
Fuck P4K!

Reply


trendsnational October 6 2021, 02:37:54 UTC
I love how Charlie just scoffed at it, these fucking hacks.

Reply

genbu_no_miko24 October 6 2021, 02:42:20 UTC
lol she did? Good for her!

Reply

shittysoup October 6 2021, 02:49:39 UTC

Lol https://t.co/L0dcAOOT8p
- Charli (@charli_xcx) October 5, 2021

Reply

genbu_no_miko24 October 6 2021, 02:55:55 UTC
"And when you don’t think too hard about it, it's pretty fun. -Cat Zhang"

God they're so pretentious and fucking rude.

"pop experiment was either satire or sincere”


... )

Reply


debbiesgirl October 6 2021, 02:38:01 UTC

genbu_no_miko24 October 6 2021, 02:41:39 UTC
Their quote is really pretentious lol

Lana having a bit of last laugh cause she got trasssshhhhed when she first came out. Now that album is considered highly influential and the new girls are reflective of that.

Even Charli XCX is getting some love because I think her music doesn't get appreciated, which granted I'll admit its an acquired taste because I use to call it artificial-sweetener pop.

Daft Punk - Random Access Memories (2013): From 8.8 to 6.8

Good I never got the hype for it.

Reply


drblind October 6 2021, 02:42:13 UTC
pitchfork is so irrelevant now it's actually funny to think back on a time where a 0.0 could legit ruin a career lol

Reply

megalixer October 6 2021, 02:44:48 UTC
tbh it's been too long since they've truly gone for the jugular, they hand out a 7ish to basically everything by default now

Reply

drblind October 6 2021, 02:47:38 UTC
their numerical scores never make sense in relation to the review itself, like on the rare occasion i read their bs i'll read something where the review makes it sound GOD AWFUL and then like u said it's a 7 and i'm like lol what

Reply

megalixer October 6 2021, 02:50:52 UTC
think they claim that the scores are done by panel while the written review is the product of a single writer, but also… clearly they don't have a problem futzing with the scores lol

Reply


Leave a comment

Up