Bryan Cranston defends role as disabled millionaire
Bryan Cranston has defended playing a disabled character in his new film, saying it is an actor's job to play different people https://t.co/dqUPpY9Shv
- Sky News (@SkyNews) January 8, 2019
Bryan Cranston has defended playing a disabled character in his new film, saying it is an actor's job to play different people ( Read more... )
Because the underwater hair effects were some of the sort visual effects I've seen in a long time(not to mention those terrible wigs - the outfits were amazing but those wigs...)
They had some very beautiful scenes, like the one you mentionned with the trench creatures and the movie was entertaining but imo that makes it a good superhero movie but not a great movie per se. One thing I wanted to see more in Aquaman is how Arthur grew up, and develop more his relationship with his dad. Because he seemed like a very important part of Arthur's life but we see so little of him. (I did like that happy ending though - I'm a sucker for true love always win)
As for Nolan trilogy, what I liked the most in TDKR was Bruce aging. The fact that he actually hurt, that his body was a mess.
Bane was laughable too, the voice was so comical
Hardy voice is... peculiar? (let's go with peculiar)
I still thing Aquaman is the superior DC release in the past few years but it's not "it" for me
I hope you're having a great day too, and will enjoy the week-end (soon)
Reply
Leave a comment