interesting interview
I clicked on this link expecting to hear a jubilant Michael Berg (father of the beheaded Nick Berg) gloat about the long awaited death of Al Zarqawi. Instead, he basically contradicts everything the interviewer says and makes a pretty solid case against Bush and friends.
Now if the father of someone BEHEADED by terrorists can realize the mistake of fighting terror by invading Iraq, then how come George Bush can't? Nobody ever killed anyone close to Bush, yet he's willing to stake his whole presidency on a laughable war of "revenge"? What a wacky world.
(Not that i don't think this guy deserved to be bombed to oblivion...he sounds like a pretty awful guy. The point is just that its not gonna accomplish anything, and almost definitely lead to more violence instead.)
Now if the father of someone BEHEADED by terrorists can realize the mistake of fighting terror by invading Iraq, then how come George Bush can't? Nobody ever killed anyone close to Bush, yet he's willing to stake his whole presidency on a laughable war of "revenge"? What a wacky world.
(Not that i don't think this guy deserved to be bombed to oblivion...he sounds like a pretty awful guy. The point is just that its not gonna accomplish anything, and almost definitely lead to more violence instead.)