a short list of semi-random things I have been thinking about!
- I try really hard not to judge people for liking things I think are badly done (as in written, mostly, or even decently written technically but with characterization I don't buy/like) or which squick me, but I fail. A lot. Even with a constant mantra of YMMV to remind me I shouldn't.
-
( Read more... )
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Any chance there might be examples?
Which is to say, I went over and read Seperis' thoughts and the comments and discussion and I am way past bedtime but I find this a really fascinating topic. I don't know that I have much (or anything) to contribute but fascination. (I think I should watch the vid, definitely. Tomorrow.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
They also get mistaken for a couple not infrequently, and have played on that sometimes to get information. The writers know what fandom is doing and they provide occasional fanservice, but I don't think there is anything quite as textual as River declaring Book should marry her and Simon.
Reply
I find incest in fic interesting because, like, I'm not bothered by it when it's twins, or Peter/Claire from Heroes (though I think that's mostly because I started shipping them before we knew they were related), and I'm CRAZY about Narnia incest (or any Narnia fic, really), but SPN incest really squicks me. That doesn't stop me from reading Wincest fic from authors I like (e.g., you), but I have different motivations for reading it than most fanfic I look at. I actually just posted a bit about this in my journal right before I saw your post, lol. And gah I can't wait until obsessive24 posts that vid because I bet it's awesome.
Reply
I am also predisposed to hetcest more than brothercest, which is one barrier for me (hence my complete love of always-a-girl!Sam AUs), I think - there are several things that keep me from shipping Sam/Dean (not that I actually ship Simon/River or Eowyn/Eomer, but I find the relationships fascinating), but mostly it's this idea that they are everything to each other, so why not this, too? makes me so sad for them both. Like, I want Dean to have friends and kids and something that belongs to him, not Sam or John. Sam had his chance at Stanford at least; Dean hasn't had anything. And the isolation of it really makes me sad, too. They need more than just each other! And adding sex to their relationship really can eliminate the need for anyone else to ever enter their ( ... )
Reply
lol, I just mentioned this in my reply to you in my journal. But yeah, Nathan and Peter don't even seem to me to have that close of a relationship. I've always thought their physical affection was more perfunctory than anything.
Like, I want Dean to have friends and kids and something that belongs to him, not Sam or John.
You know, it's interesting that you phrased it that exact way because on the show the one thing that DOES clearly belong to Dean and no one else is the car, and we see how he places a lot of meaning and importance on it and perhaps personifies it to some extent. And if it's not done in canon, it certainly is in the fic. So it's like Dean needs something external to latch onto but doesn't have the experience required to figure that out and do so and is using the car as a substitute? If that makes sense.
Sam had his chance at Stanford at least; Dean hasn't had anything.It made me so sad in "Skin" when the shapeshifter said something to Sam about Sam getting to go to ( ... )
Reply
Well, yes, and no? Have you seen Dead Man's Blood yet? Clearly, the car becomes identified with Dean (see Sam's insistence it be saved in IMToD, even if it has only one working piece), but for Dean I think the car is also a symbol of his father (see the end of ELAC), as well as himself, and also of the life before the fire (they have the car in the pilot, after all, and it's home in a way no place else ever can be).
That car carries the weight of a lot of symbolism. *snerk*
Nathan and Peter don't even seem to me to have that close of a relationship. I've always thought their physical affection was more perfunctory than anything.
Yeah, I don't really see it? I mean, possibly after Nathan's all mangled and guilty over Peter's "death", something could happen? But they never struck me as particularly close in season 1, let alone close enough for things to be really weird and sexual.
"You don't think I had dreams of my own?" It broke my ( ... )
Reply
However, I still don't get Springsteen. I know he's The Boss and all, but somehow, his brand of music just never appealed to me. Same with Bob Dylan. I can appreciate poetic lyric as the next person, but melody-wise, they never captured me. But that never stopped me from listening the Springsteen stuff you share and try to figure out the aesthetics. Guess I'm just unsophisticated.
Again, thank you. My ears thank you.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment