.:IV:. drip and drip, I slip, my grip, beneath your lips, I slip... I slip
Fools are those, who think that evil can only be one-sided. It dwells not only in the obscurity of the night, but also in the very brightness of the day in the minds of those, one least suspects. Double-edged and flowing like quicksilver, evil evaporates and reappears in places most unexpected. It is that quality of 'evil' as a phenomenological concept that makes for quite the ironic twist in the status quo of what we have today.
So who is to say what is 'evil' and what is 'unevil'? Suppose there is a certain organization functioning in the British society (leave the rest of the world to the wiser ones) that takes up on this noble responsibility of defining what is 'good' and what is 'evil'. Undoubtedly, the organization considers itself a den of the 'good' and the 'kind', whereas those unbelonging to that group, whether for ideological reasons or purely mercantile, are automatically considered 'evil' or 'strange'. And so a spiritual, mental, moral and military war is waged on those unbelonging and a fight over the minds of the rest of the population rages.
An internationally known adage states that all is fair in love and war. Then doesn't it mean that the 'good' side adopting the less than politically correct methods of the 'bad' side equalizes both of the parties on the scale of 'evil'? Killing just like my side, torturing my friends, humiliating me Who is to say which side is right then?
I only ask of you, my comrades in magic, blood, and/or mind, let us have less of the pathetic and the sanctimonious, and more of the healthy. Who would ever be fooled by what these Messrs. Buttson and Potcher have concocted out of the depths of their own moral deprivation and low-grade reporting skills. What may be clearly said of those Messrs. is that Buttson and Potcher are not exactly who I, or any other sane Wizard of legitimate age, would call professional journalists, or indeed, merely objective observers. What the Messrs. did to their precious truth is vulgarization of the noble concept with their own politically infused agenda, which clearly supports the likes of one Harry Potter and his numerous sycophants.
The inherent sanctimony of such a periodical, claiming to guide us the ignorant in the quest for truth, while indeed only intending to cover up for the prurient and most noted Wizard, leaves one wondering - where are we being led?
So who is to say what is 'evil' and what is 'unevil'? Suppose there is a certain organization functioning in the British society (leave the rest of the world to the wiser ones) that takes up on this noble responsibility of defining what is 'good' and what is 'evil'. Undoubtedly, the organization considers itself a den of the 'good' and the 'kind', whereas those unbelonging to that group, whether for ideological reasons or purely mercantile, are automatically considered 'evil' or 'strange'. And so a spiritual, mental, moral and military war is waged on those unbelonging and a fight over the minds of the rest of the population rages.
An internationally known adage states that all is fair in love and war. Then doesn't it mean that the 'good' side adopting the less than politically correct methods of the 'bad' side equalizes both of the parties on the scale of 'evil'? Killing just like my side, torturing my friends, humiliating me Who is to say which side is right then?
I only ask of you, my comrades in magic, blood, and/or mind, let us have less of the pathetic and the sanctimonious, and more of the healthy. Who would ever be fooled by what these Messrs. Buttson and Potcher have concocted out of the depths of their own moral deprivation and low-grade reporting skills. What may be clearly said of those Messrs. is that Buttson and Potcher are not exactly who I, or any other sane Wizard of legitimate age, would call professional journalists, or indeed, merely objective observers. What the Messrs. did to their precious truth is vulgarization of the noble concept with their own politically infused agenda, which clearly supports the likes of one Harry Potter and his numerous sycophants.
The inherent sanctimony of such a periodical, claiming to guide us the ignorant in the quest for truth, while indeed only intending to cover up for the prurient and most noted Wizard, leaves one wondering - where are we being led?