Is all fair in love and war?

Jul 18, 2004 12:58

Monday night I felt like a movie, so I shut down around 10:30, got my popcorn out and went to watch "Something to Talk About." Okay, this is something of a chick flick. I have a closet grudging respect for chick flicks, if they are done well. This one was interesting. The movie stars Denis Quaid and Julia Roberts as Eddie and Grace Bichon, a ( Read more... )

love, ponderings and curiosity, philosophy, movies

Leave a comment

Wow. That was interesting! montecristo July 19 2004, 01:44:12 UTC
You know, I think I'm going to take your statistics at face value with regard to whether men or wome cheat more often. It does match with the idea that men and women pursue different "biological strategies" with regard to sex -- the woman trying to find a stable mate who will care for her children and their home and the man attempting to spread his genetic material as far as possible. Eh. I'm not so sure of motivations and evolutionary drives, but culturally, I think you're right -- that double standard is the traditional one. I think that feminism though has made inroads on it. Surprisingly enough, I think much of modern feminism has done less to enlighten and elevate men but rather provide women a liscense to be just as uncouth and unethical as some of the more boorish men.

For what it's worth, I am one of those people who believes that sex is far too important to be indiscriminate or promiscuous about it. I believe that it is self-debasement to treat something like sex cavalierly. To be honest, my ex wasn't just "indulging her libido" or "screwing around." It was "the communication problem" between us too. Her reaction though, was just to "go shopping" for something else regardless of what it did to her family. What I found most unjust and painful nevertheless, was her deceit and the fact that she did it repeatedly, instead of being honest or at least having the self-control to not screw someone else while allowing me to believe that she was still interested in being my wife. The biggest thing I fault her for is not that she did cheat, but that she thought I would be too stupid to catch her at it and that she couldn't just be honest with me about what she was doing. I could understand deception and even more drastic measures if I had been threatening her or blackmailing her or applying some other unethical coercion to keep her as "property" but I wasn't. Hell, I suspect that "sneakiness" was part of the "charm" of having an affair for her. In the end, she did it with impugnity, because I think it was simply easier for her, in the short run -- better living through deceit. In her mind, I think deceit allowed her to have her cake and eat it too. She didn't need to do the work of fixing anything with me as long as she had an "escape hatch." She keeps insisting, probably as a justification or a sop to her own conscience, that I regard her as evil. I don't. She's not. She's just contemptibly weak and cowardly. I guess finally deciding to cut her "lifeline" and leave me took some courage, and perhaps I should thank her, but frankly I'm just too disgusted with the whole mess to afford her much sympathy.

You're right about the revenge thing. My point though is why should a woman accept that "underdog" self-assessment by wallowing in petty revenge gratification? The need for petty revenge is just empowering to the object of ones frustration. As I said, if it is beneath the wronged man to take it out on the woman, why should it not be beneath the woman too? If a woman sets herself up to be used by a cad and a jackass, why should she not take responsibility for her decisions?

You've given me a couple of things to consider. I may have more to say after thinking about things a bit. Thanks.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up