The standard 35mm movie theatre screen is 34 times the size of a 27" television screen. And considering the 35mm screen is already much less than the intended 70mm, that puts my screen at a puny 68 times less than what this film's potential is! So I doubt finding a slightly bigger screen will matter.
All this talk about size mattering is making me feel inadequate.
Great! I'm glad I'm not the only to like that film!
Yes, I think the slow plot combined with long length turns many off. One guy leaving the theater as I was waiting to go in looked at his girlfriend, laughed, and said, "That was the most boring movie I ever saw!"
I saw it. I thought parts of it were good, but parts of it just wear on me. I totally love Terrance Malick, though this one didn't live up to what I wanted it to be.
I thought it was brilliant, especially in his non-formal use of editing in which he threw visual continuity out the window, but of the five films he's directed, I think Badlands is still my favourite. Although I still have yet to see Lanton Mills (1969).
Comments 14
Reply
Reply
Reply
All this talk about size mattering is making me feel inadequate.
Reply
Reply
I think not.
Reply
Reply
And still, I can see where many people will hate it.
Shalom, y'all!
L. Bangs
Reply
Some people might hate it? I suppose that might be due to the tone-poem nature?
And oh yeah, I got around to watching The Children of Paradise last week. It was just as good as you advertised!
Reply
Yes, I think the slow plot combined with long length turns many off. One guy leaving the theater as I was waiting to go in looked at his girlfriend, laughed, and said, "That was the most boring movie I ever saw!"
Obviously, I can't say the same. :)
Shalom, y'all!
L. Bangs
Reply
The Thin Red Line is my favorite film by T.M.
Reply
I thought it was brilliant, especially in his non-formal use of editing in which he threw visual continuity out the window, but of the five films he's directed, I think Badlands is still my favourite. Although I still have yet to see Lanton Mills (1969).
What parts wore on you?
Reply
Leave a comment