A good piece featuring a must-read bit to keep in mind with your leftist "friends". Test this out for yourself if you don't believe it
( Read more... )
The article seems to belabor the obvious, and the author a "Master of the Obvious". It would hardly be necessary were it not so true that, to a liberal, reality is that thing that won't leave them alone no matter how hard you wish it would. There's the extensive use of thought stoppers. "Racism" is their favourite, and always has been.
Doesn't matter that the Liberal "Dear Leader" is spending more and faster than even GWB managed, or that O'Care™ is taking over a big slice of the economy, or that now is a lousy time for such new spending, or that the Russians aren't interested in a round of Kumbayah with either the Georgians or the Ukrainians, or so on and so on. It couldn't be that. It's because he's black, and, of course, conservatives can't accept a black POTUS. It would seem that a lot of libbies really do believe this since they can't fathom why anyone would worry about a big, new, intrusive, massively expensive new libbie program in a time of runaway spending and a near miss of the collapse of the whole financial house of cards. We literally can't afford to indulge our libbies with their socialistic pipe dreams any longer. We survived the NewDeal™, FairDeal™, the GreatSociety™, though growing weaker with every dalliance with socialism, but we survived. This was one of the considerations that stopped HillaryCare™ back in the early 1990s -- it was too expensive.
The "wrong side of history" -- whatever that means, you'd need to be psychic -- is a kissin' cousin to once these cranky, grumpy, old white men hurry up and croak the young 'uns can go ahead and build that world of Sunshine, Gumdrops, Lollipops, and Unicorn farts for all. As if cranky old white men were somehow powerful enough to do such a thing, as if there aren't any new, young conservatives (I see them all the time at TP rallies: the attendees are a good deal younger than the PravdaPress™ would have you believe). They crow about this in one form or another all the time. What these libbies forget (or never learned in the first place, or want you to forget) is that the truth value of a proposition doesn't depend on the age of those who propose it.
There's also the form over substance preference, and the judging of the worth of a policy by the WarmFuzzies™ factor. If it makes them feel good, virtuous, smugly superior in morals and intellect, that's good enough. Doesn't matter if the policy is a demonstrable failure over and over, time after time.
Doesn't matter that the Liberal "Dear Leader" is spending more and faster than even GWB managed, or that O'Care™ is taking over a big slice of the economy, or that now is a lousy time for such new spending, or that the Russians aren't interested in a round of Kumbayah with either the Georgians or the Ukrainians, or so on and so on. It couldn't be that. It's because he's black, and, of course, conservatives can't accept a black POTUS. It would seem that a lot of libbies really do believe this since they can't fathom why anyone would worry about a big, new, intrusive, massively expensive new libbie program in a time of runaway spending and a near miss of the collapse of the whole financial house of cards. We literally can't afford to indulge our libbies with their socialistic pipe dreams any longer. We survived the NewDeal™, FairDeal™, the GreatSociety™, though growing weaker with every dalliance with socialism, but we survived. This was one of the considerations that stopped HillaryCare™ back in the early 1990s -- it was too expensive.
The "wrong side of history" -- whatever that means, you'd need to be psychic -- is a kissin' cousin to once these cranky, grumpy, old white men hurry up and croak the young 'uns can go ahead and build that world of Sunshine, Gumdrops, Lollipops, and Unicorn farts for all. As if cranky old white men were somehow powerful enough to do such a thing, as if there aren't any new, young conservatives (I see them all the time at TP rallies: the attendees are a good deal younger than the PravdaPress™ would have you believe). They crow about this in one form or another all the time. What these libbies forget (or never learned in the first place, or want you to forget) is that the truth value of a proposition doesn't depend on the age of those who propose it.
There's also the form over substance preference, and the judging of the worth of a policy by the WarmFuzzies™ factor. If it makes them feel good, virtuous, smugly superior in morals and intellect, that's good enough. Doesn't matter if the policy is a demonstrable failure over and over, time after time.
Reply
Leave a comment