BSG, Universe and a Watchmen Review

Mar 22, 2009 20:13

I'm trying desperately to ignore the fact that BSG has ended. If I don’t think about it, I won't be tempted to find out how it ends and spoil myself. Although I may have accidentally spoiled myself for one small but crucial detail. In terms of my own watching, I've just finished Maelstrom in season three, so I'm getting there.

A trailer has been Read more... )

battlestar galactica, stargate, movies

Leave a comment

not lecturing, but your take on it does make me think... frenchroast March 22 2009, 22:59:38 UTC
Hmm. All the stuff you say you dislike is why I liked it. The point of the movie in this case was simply to tell the exact same story in a different medium, which they did about as flawlessly as you can. That's why people are calling it brilliant, and I have to agree, even if it means there was nothing new added to the story (the old "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach, which is too rarely employed in most book-to-movie creations ( ... )

Reply

Re: not lecturing, but your take on it does make me think... meddow March 23 2009, 03:19:07 UTC
I have to admit, the filmmakers must have gone through amazing lengths to painstakingly recreate panels, so from a technological standpoint, the movie is both groundbreaking and a triumph.

I think really, why we disagree comes down to what a view about what an adaptation should do. I think good adaptations adds something to the source material, such as its matching visual beauty the words on the paper, or showing how the original text applies to contemporary concerns. The Lord of the Rings and Atonement I think are a good example of the former, and The Dark Knight of the latter. The nature of an adaptation means it has to take things away from the original. The difference between a good adaptation and a bad one is that a good one adds more than it takes way ( ... )

Reply

Re: not lecturing, but your take on it does make me think... frenchroast March 23 2009, 06:55:37 UTC
I actually don't disagree with you per se. I think you absolutely have a valid point about adaptions either adding to or contemporizing the original source material. I'm just of the opinion that a loyal recreation of the source material in another medium is a valid kind of adaptation, in addition to the two you cite ( ... )

Reply

Re: not lecturing, but your take on it does make me think... meddow March 24 2009, 05:57:10 UTC
Wow, I didn't know LotR went to that extent with the visuals.

That's a really good point, and one I didn't think of, about how mediums speak to different people. I'm a bit fan of graphic novels because they work for me as a medium better than ordinary novels, and sometimes (certainly in this case) better than movies.

There is that issue with Watchmen canon that doesn't apply to most comics. But other graphic novels with singular canons such as the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, From Hell, and V for Vendetta had been adapted for movies without such loyalty. But then, I've never read V for Vendetta and From Hell. The only one I've both read and seen the movie is League, which was a really bad movie which actually would have been a lot better if they stuck closer to the graphic novel - so really, that argues your point ( ... )

Reply

Re: not lecturing, but your take on it does make me think... frenchroast March 24 2009, 14:49:16 UTC
Yeah. LotR was...kind of scary in its attention to detail. Of course if they hadn't, I suppose they wouldn't have had enough material for four different commentary tracks. I'm in the exact same situation with the four graphic novels/movie adaptations that you mentioned, too. I *think* I recall hearing that visually V for Vendetta was similar to the graphic novel, but apparently movie!Evie is less of a whiny brat (which sounds like an improvement) but I haven't read it myself, so I couldn't say for sure.

And yeah, the discussion's been good for me, too, because when I initially read your post, at first all I could think was "but I liked it!" This helped me realize *why* I like it.

Go us and rational, thoughtful discussion! :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up