Mysterious Grey Lady

Aug 15, 2007 16:15

A major newspaper article with the words 'Math' and 'Sex' in the headline! ! !!

Something approaching a formal mathematical proof is found in the body of the article! !!

Teh interwebs reacts with more rabble-rousing on the matter!! !

Leave a comment

Comments 15

yagowe August 15 2007, 21:48:59 UTC
I almost want to stop having sex now, just to avoid the label "the Ted Turner of sex".

Reply

tiwonge August 15 2007, 22:03:07 UTC
Are you in danger of being called that?

Reply

yagowe August 15 2007, 22:12:42 UTC
Not really, I'm just looking for an excuse to make it look like not having sex is my idea.

Reply


chezmax August 15 2007, 21:59:02 UTC
"Sexual Ted Turnerism" is the most disturbing phrase I've read all day...

Reply


sushimustwrite August 16 2007, 01:54:28 UTC
Your subject made me think this was from a HP community before I kept reading. Seeing it was from this comm and reading about a sexual Ted Turner definitely made up for it.

I think I'll read that article on the health benefits on promiscuity now.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

chainkill August 16 2007, 11:36:10 UTC
You're my hero.

Reply

kensson August 16 2007, 16:45:07 UTC
Another possibility that springs to my mind is that it might be that a very small number of very promiscuous women weren't found by the survey (or, perhaps less probably, a small number of strictly monogamous or virgin males - I say less probably because you can only drag a number down so much, but you can drag a number up much further).

What would be interesting would be to see the distribution of the responses. Then we might be able to draw some conclusions.

Reply

mothwentbad August 16 2007, 17:10:05 UTC
Lies, damned lies, and the other thing, eh?

I seem to remember hearing that boys are wicked horny in the 14-20 range (I can testify in favor of this), but that for women, it often picks up somewhere around 30-35.

Whatever. You're on my friends page now.

Reply


I did laugh out loud reading this wonderful article bec_87rb August 16 2007, 17:10:54 UTC
YAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA...
Funny article, thanks for posting it.

People lie on self-report surveys, and they lie in a major ginormous way about sex. Duh. Has anybody ever actually read the Kinsey Report, or any those major sexual activity assays? One subject reported having 50 orgasms a week. *moment of silence to think about that*

Okay, how many of you think this man was lying?
How many of you think he was laughing his @ss off when he wrote "50" in the little space on the survey form?

*holds up hand*

What does that do to the mean, x number of jokers reporting they came 7 times a day, 7 days a week? Yeah. And considering that men routinely tell you they are an inch taller than they are, and women routinely tell you they are 5-10 pounds thinner than they are, what we are actually measuring in self-report sex surveys is the differential response of the genders to social pressures. It's fantasy to think that a huge percentage of subjects are not lying at least a little on these ( ... )

Reply

Re: I did laugh out loud reading this wonderful article gracewanderer August 17 2007, 19:49:19 UTC
So in other words, if my number of *actual* sex partners reflects the average *reported* number of sex partners, I can rest knowing that I've finally made up for all the time I lost being Mormon?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up