Comments | manfleshbuffet: An Observance by Manflesh

manfleshbuffet

An Observance by Manflesh

Sep 28, 2005 01:06

My deepest apologies for the drought. The Daily Manflesh will now resume it's previous role in society.

As I mentioned in my first pronouncement, this agglomeration would address certain other aspects of society aside from cannibalism. After about eight minutes of careful consideration, I realized yet another fault of society.

Medical studies claim ( Read more... )

Comments 37

mantikore September 28 2005, 10:10:16 UTC

took the words right out of my mouth

manfleshbuffet September 28 2005, 21:35:40 UTC

That's assuring.

n_a_j_i September 28 2005, 10:18:32 UTC

That's exactly how it is.

vendettawonder September 28 2005, 20:24:50 UTC

oh, josh. you are so level-headed. ♥ =]

manfleshbuffet September 29 2005, 01:26:05 UTC

Thank you...?
If by level-headed you mean stupid, then yes I will take no for an answer...what?

Have fun at your dancing. =)

footiegrl September 28 2005, 21:11:09 UTC

i dont think i could ever be depressed. id be so bored

manfleshbuffet September 28 2005, 21:36:27 UTC

Yeah I agree. You just sit there. Boring.

jack anonymous September 28 2005, 21:24:25 UTC

hey josh, look at me, i'm depressed!!

/mean

Seriously, I agree with most of what you said, although I find that the technological advances we have over the people of the dark ages is depressing in itself. In just 50 years, kids will be having "pollution days" more often than we have snow days. Every time my family vacations in the adirondacks, I think of how much more kick-ass it would have been even 100 years ago.

eh...good call josh

Re: jack manfleshbuffet September 28 2005, 21:57:22 UTC

It is true that growing industries are destroying our world. The trade of beautiful landscapes for factories was a sacrafice we were forced to make, not by our government, but by our own selfishness. The population in general cares more for a new mall than an old forest. I tend to be on the losing side of social issues, and this is no exception. I am all for forests. Realistically, we need this land to extend the existance of our species. Technology is the main reason for our survival, no matter how much you may deny it. It would not surprise me, however, if technology was responsible for the end of our species as well.

jack anonymous September 29 2005, 00:14:22 UTC

If the human race stopped killing forests and industrializing right now though, there may still be hope. Then all we'd have to do is keep our population in check, and our planet would live out a nice long life; such as if it ate garlic and rice with every meal.

As far as the population problem goes, me and matt vail came up with the slogan that will solve all of our problems: "if you can afford it, abort it" (has a nice ring to it, eh?). Thus, all we're left with is the few babies of the lower class who grow into hard-working individuals, and the accidental babies that will die from heroin addictions at the age of 7.

How bout it?

Re: jack manfleshbuffet September 29 2005, 01:24:49 UTC

Yeah I agree that technology is currently perfect. We could not advance technology for another million years and peopel would be fine with it. Again, population is the only real issue. Your solution's not bad. I think we just need to work on promoting passive cannibalism and investing resources into advancing the land we already take up.

Thread 14