Mathematical mania of mass shootings.
One other reason I found to remain skeptical of Trump was his saying antagonistic things about the woke trans movement. This movement tends to be just another well-funded manifestation of the war on Western culture, as planned by the WEF NWO mad scientists, yes. Just one more cultural stream which they have hijacked - like environmentalism, anti-racism, anti-fascism, and so on. Amplifying it into something radically divisive.
However, many conservatives are falling for the bait. And so they spend all their time railing against trans, to the point that, yes, they do get a little ad-hominum towards both, "the sin and the sinner." And the left interprets this as a full-on anti-trans movement originating from the right. (Just as they interpret the keeping of sexually-exploitive books out of elementary school libraries as a full on book-burning mania coming from the right). Division and collapse are the goals of the divide-and-conquer corporate elites.
And, so, many conservative talkers spend all their time talking about trans, trans, trans, and less time talking about more important things, like the pending WHO rules allowing top-down health controls over your and my bodies. A very real threat. Meaning you can be forced to undergo "medical therapies" that will eventually or soon kill you. AND, your health records will be monitored and linked to your CBDC spending capacities. These are their ultimate objectives. This is not a test.
Remember when Trump said he actually didn't have a problem with trans people, and he welcomed them aboard? That was back when he displayed some of his true liberal nature. Recently, though, he railed against the so-called trans movement. Was this just him trying to capitalise on the sentiments rising on the right?
Or was this him following orders from on high, now that the time was right. only a day or two after that speech, summoning his base, there was the trans shooting in Tennessee. AND, there was the planned trans quasi-militarisation rally, (which was later cancelled). So - that is just way too much of a coincidence for me to let slide.
Trump also brandished a baseball bat. A very weird and obvious red flag. Bizarre. However, I later heard that this was only a photograph of Trump showing off some special bat he had receieved somewhere - signed or whatever. I would be perfectly fine accepting this as an explanation, and cross the crazy-man-with-a-bat item on my suspicion-of-Trump list in my head. Just as I quickly learnt that the whole story about Trump attacking the driver who took him away from the Jan.6 rally, was BOGUS. Planted. A LIE. Used, with other crap, to support the whole January 6 Committee charade meant to galvanise masses against MAGA, as if the right were nothing but blood-hungry NAZIs.
I question things like where the term MAGA came from. And who came up with the idea of Trump's arrival by escalator, etc. Were these symbolic creations made up by the Trump campaign, or were they more nonsense from the scheming world-control Destructionists, who are largely associated with the Deep State, Floor Seven, and elite international communists and corporatists. Like, "Build Back Better!" Like, "A Thousand Points Of Light!" And so on, and so on.
Like the fake moral outrage and, "that's absurd!" name-calling, that almost always indicates that the person is full of shit, and is actually guilty as charged...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrvJowCBVkA
Back to that trans shooting. Which just happened to reinforce the prejudice or right-wing moralists, and to reinforce the anti-gun and anti-christian prejudice of the left-wing fundamentalists. (BTW - the left wing has become so over-the-top that it is no longer liberal, it is hyper-conservative. Anti-racism has become racism. Anti-fascism has become fascism. Pro-woman has become anti-woman. Freedom of choice has become medical tyranny. And so forth).
Well, that shooting was also too suspect to let slide. It seems to be one of those contrived incidents manufactured by the Destructionists. By now, they, (as via the FBI), know enough about psychology, mind-altering drugs and mood-manipulation technology, to entice or recruit potential shooters into their crimes. Not saying all mass shooting are fakes. Some are encouraged or manufactured.
First of all, the trans shooting checked all the boxes above, what a coincidence. Next, after the shooting, a whole camouflaged campaign popped up in various friendly places, painting the shooter as more of a victim than the victims. Another suspicious coincidence.
Next, this time, the police responded at breakneck speed. Doesn't this contrast drastically to what happened in Texas? (Another highly suspect shooting). Were the (hypothesized) planners meaning to escape the overwhelming public scorn, this time? Note that the left, as commanded, once had a full-on campaign of, "defund the police," which was later reversed, and blamed on Republicans, (bizarrely).
Note also that there has been a regular method of standing-down by police in various critical incidents. (Also by command). I believe this first occurred in UK riots possibly around 2012 - lasting for three days. Although rationalised to the public that this tactic was meant to protect the police from inevitable harm, and to allow the riots to, "burn themselves out," what the tactic also tends to do is to permit and encourage more violence, destruction and division. The tactic has since been used often in the USA.
The intention has been to muster anger against local police, and try to get it to accept a federal police force. (More on this subject some other time).
But, in the case of the Texas shooting, the police stand-down apparently took too much public attention away from the intended issue, and meme, or gun violence.
The intention between that is to push anti-gun laws, in order to disarm the people, and better facilitate top-down control, (or even an invasion from China, which may be in the hopper). Disarming the citizenry has long been a method used to help bring in tyrannical regimes. THIS IS A FACT.
So, this may be why, if the TN shooting was planned, the police did respond quickly, this time.
This time, we see video of some police officers waving in the guy with the video camera. Why would they do that, unless this was some kind of show?
Finally, it appears that there is a good chance that the TN shooting had been pre-recorded. Why do I say this? Because, even though it was said that all the school kids - hundreds of them - had been shuttled upstairs. But, instead, we see the shooter all alone in the hallways. Not only that, the shooter, herself, looks like she was putting on a show. Showing off the big terrible gun.
And when the time came for her to be shot, she did not flinch, which would be the natural instinct. She just stood there, waiting to be shot by the coincidentally videotaped police. That certainly looks like some kind of play-acting to me.
Now, you will notice that many mass shootings have occurred in so-called blue states, earlier on in this ongoing plague. Columbine, for example. Some or most of these may or may not have been natural eruptions of violence. Or, some of them may have been controlled. I don't know.
I do know that gun violence occurs more in Dem cities where gun-control is strict. And, of course, there would be little point in staging fake shootings in states where gun laws are more strict. (Unless a wave of opposition was meant to be slowly cultivated).
The most recent shooting - in a Louisville bank - was in a red state, but the shooter killed two friends of a Republican governor. Who knows - yet - what was up in that case.
But, normally, the rule has been, in the corporatist media, if the shooter is found to be anything other than a (right-wing) white male, the story is immediately diminished or disappeared. And this is not conjecture, on my part. It happens. You can study it in real time. Sometimes, the shooter is a left-wing ideologue and yet he will be painted as a right-wing supremacist. This is what happened in the Pittsburgh shooting and the (Ohio??) "black supermarket" shooting.
The story of the crazed driver in Wisconsin was minimised when it was discovered that the guy was a black racist rapper. Meanwhile, the Kenosha self-defense shooter was plastered all over the media, and that guy was torn apart.
With the TN trans shooter, real or manufactured, the criminal was left-wing, apparently. But, as discussed above, the incident checked the boxes above. As in the Pittsburgh shooting, the true victims were church members. After the shooting, a story ran than the shooter had been traumatised by Christians because of her sexuality. Again, that was attended by the Trump weirdness and the planned rad trans rally.
It may be that, in possibly manufactured shootings, especially in "red" states, the requirement that the shooter be right-wing may have been dropped.
It does appear to me that, relatively recently, the suspect shootings are occurring more and more in "red" states, such as KY, TX, FL, etc.
There has been a concerted war against "red" states going on for some years. Recall Biden not allowing anti-body therapies to go to Florida, and to other red states. Recall that there is a real correlation between red states and higher incidence of deaths form the mRNA injections, which is technically an engineered bioweapon, just like the virus. Similarly, there is a growing campaign against Christians and whites, as part of the Destructionists package to dismantle the West.
And, again, China's balloon did a little surrey through the "red belt."
And, there has long been a push to disempower red states, by changing the electoral college system, or adding new states.
And, there is a correlation of the routes of trains carrying toxic or explosive cargo and red states.
So, a hypothesis that some shootings may recently have been, intentionally, situated in red states is a valid one.
Dismantling nationalism is a primary concern of globalist groups meaning to increase their controls. Groups such as international Marxist organisations, banking cabals and wealth family syndicates. There has been a war upon the West, as well.
This is what has been going on, like it or not. It can be argued through institutional, geopolitical and macroeconomic theory.
And example.
The January 6 narrative was just one giant example of ploys discussed above.
The flood of illegal immigrants is not only meant to tilt the balance of votes towards Dems, but to destabilize society in general, (fentanyl, COVID, jobs, crime, spies, parasites, etc.), beginning with a focus on red states. So that's where many of them are shipped.
However, many conservatives are falling for the bait. And so they spend all their time railing against trans, to the point that, yes, they do get a little ad-hominum towards both, "the sin and the sinner." And the left interprets this as a full-on anti-trans movement originating from the right. (Just as they interpret the keeping of sexually-exploitive books out of elementary school libraries as a full on book-burning mania coming from the right). Division and collapse are the goals of the divide-and-conquer corporate elites.
And, so, many conservative talkers spend all their time talking about trans, trans, trans, and less time talking about more important things, like the pending WHO rules allowing top-down health controls over your and my bodies. A very real threat. Meaning you can be forced to undergo "medical therapies" that will eventually or soon kill you. AND, your health records will be monitored and linked to your CBDC spending capacities. These are their ultimate objectives. This is not a test.
Remember when Trump said he actually didn't have a problem with trans people, and he welcomed them aboard? That was back when he displayed some of his true liberal nature. Recently, though, he railed against the so-called trans movement. Was this just him trying to capitalise on the sentiments rising on the right?
Or was this him following orders from on high, now that the time was right. only a day or two after that speech, summoning his base, there was the trans shooting in Tennessee. AND, there was the planned trans quasi-militarisation rally, (which was later cancelled). So - that is just way too much of a coincidence for me to let slide.
Trump also brandished a baseball bat. A very weird and obvious red flag. Bizarre. However, I later heard that this was only a photograph of Trump showing off some special bat he had receieved somewhere - signed or whatever. I would be perfectly fine accepting this as an explanation, and cross the crazy-man-with-a-bat item on my suspicion-of-Trump list in my head. Just as I quickly learnt that the whole story about Trump attacking the driver who took him away from the Jan.6 rally, was BOGUS. Planted. A LIE. Used, with other crap, to support the whole January 6 Committee charade meant to galvanise masses against MAGA, as if the right were nothing but blood-hungry NAZIs.
I question things like where the term MAGA came from. And who came up with the idea of Trump's arrival by escalator, etc. Were these symbolic creations made up by the Trump campaign, or were they more nonsense from the scheming world-control Destructionists, who are largely associated with the Deep State, Floor Seven, and elite international communists and corporatists. Like, "Build Back Better!" Like, "A Thousand Points Of Light!" And so on, and so on.
Like the fake moral outrage and, "that's absurd!" name-calling, that almost always indicates that the person is full of shit, and is actually guilty as charged...
Click to viewhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrvJowCBVkA
Back to that trans shooting. Which just happened to reinforce the prejudice or right-wing moralists, and to reinforce the anti-gun and anti-christian prejudice of the left-wing fundamentalists. (BTW - the left wing has become so over-the-top that it is no longer liberal, it is hyper-conservative. Anti-racism has become racism. Anti-fascism has become fascism. Pro-woman has become anti-woman. Freedom of choice has become medical tyranny. And so forth).
Well, that shooting was also too suspect to let slide. It seems to be one of those contrived incidents manufactured by the Destructionists. By now, they, (as via the FBI), know enough about psychology, mind-altering drugs and mood-manipulation technology, to entice or recruit potential shooters into their crimes. Not saying all mass shooting are fakes. Some are encouraged or manufactured.
First of all, the trans shooting checked all the boxes above, what a coincidence. Next, after the shooting, a whole camouflaged campaign popped up in various friendly places, painting the shooter as more of a victim than the victims. Another suspicious coincidence.
Next, this time, the police responded at breakneck speed. Doesn't this contrast drastically to what happened in Texas? (Another highly suspect shooting). Were the (hypothesized) planners meaning to escape the overwhelming public scorn, this time? Note that the left, as commanded, once had a full-on campaign of, "defund the police," which was later reversed, and blamed on Republicans, (bizarrely).
Note also that there has been a regular method of standing-down by police in various critical incidents. (Also by command). I believe this first occurred in UK riots possibly around 2012 - lasting for three days. Although rationalised to the public that this tactic was meant to protect the police from inevitable harm, and to allow the riots to, "burn themselves out," what the tactic also tends to do is to permit and encourage more violence, destruction and division. The tactic has since been used often in the USA.
The intention has been to muster anger against local police, and try to get it to accept a federal police force. (More on this subject some other time).
But, in the case of the Texas shooting, the police stand-down apparently took too much public attention away from the intended issue, and meme, or gun violence.
The intention between that is to push anti-gun laws, in order to disarm the people, and better facilitate top-down control, (or even an invasion from China, which may be in the hopper). Disarming the citizenry has long been a method used to help bring in tyrannical regimes. THIS IS A FACT.
So, this may be why, if the TN shooting was planned, the police did respond quickly, this time.
This time, we see video of some police officers waving in the guy with the video camera. Why would they do that, unless this was some kind of show?
Finally, it appears that there is a good chance that the TN shooting had been pre-recorded. Why do I say this? Because, even though it was said that all the school kids - hundreds of them - had been shuttled upstairs. But, instead, we see the shooter all alone in the hallways. Not only that, the shooter, herself, looks like she was putting on a show. Showing off the big terrible gun.
And when the time came for her to be shot, she did not flinch, which would be the natural instinct. She just stood there, waiting to be shot by the coincidentally videotaped police. That certainly looks like some kind of play-acting to me.
Now, you will notice that many mass shootings have occurred in so-called blue states, earlier on in this ongoing plague. Columbine, for example. Some or most of these may or may not have been natural eruptions of violence. Or, some of them may have been controlled. I don't know.
I do know that gun violence occurs more in Dem cities where gun-control is strict. And, of course, there would be little point in staging fake shootings in states where gun laws are more strict. (Unless a wave of opposition was meant to be slowly cultivated).
The most recent shooting - in a Louisville bank - was in a red state, but the shooter killed two friends of a Republican governor. Who knows - yet - what was up in that case.
But, normally, the rule has been, in the corporatist media, if the shooter is found to be anything other than a (right-wing) white male, the story is immediately diminished or disappeared. And this is not conjecture, on my part. It happens. You can study it in real time. Sometimes, the shooter is a left-wing ideologue and yet he will be painted as a right-wing supremacist. This is what happened in the Pittsburgh shooting and the (Ohio??) "black supermarket" shooting.
The story of the crazed driver in Wisconsin was minimised when it was discovered that the guy was a black racist rapper. Meanwhile, the Kenosha self-defense shooter was plastered all over the media, and that guy was torn apart.
With the TN trans shooter, real or manufactured, the criminal was left-wing, apparently. But, as discussed above, the incident checked the boxes above. As in the Pittsburgh shooting, the true victims were church members. After the shooting, a story ran than the shooter had been traumatised by Christians because of her sexuality. Again, that was attended by the Trump weirdness and the planned rad trans rally.
It may be that, in possibly manufactured shootings, especially in "red" states, the requirement that the shooter be right-wing may have been dropped.
It does appear to me that, relatively recently, the suspect shootings are occurring more and more in "red" states, such as KY, TX, FL, etc.
There has been a concerted war against "red" states going on for some years. Recall Biden not allowing anti-body therapies to go to Florida, and to other red states. Recall that there is a real correlation between red states and higher incidence of deaths form the mRNA injections, which is technically an engineered bioweapon, just like the virus. Similarly, there is a growing campaign against Christians and whites, as part of the Destructionists package to dismantle the West.
And, again, China's balloon did a little surrey through the "red belt."
And, there has long been a push to disempower red states, by changing the electoral college system, or adding new states.
And, there is a correlation of the routes of trains carrying toxic or explosive cargo and red states.
So, a hypothesis that some shootings may recently have been, intentionally, situated in red states is a valid one.
Dismantling nationalism is a primary concern of globalist groups meaning to increase their controls. Groups such as international Marxist organisations, banking cabals and wealth family syndicates. There has been a war upon the West, as well.
This is what has been going on, like it or not. It can be argued through institutional, geopolitical and macroeconomic theory.
And example.
The January 6 narrative was just one giant example of ploys discussed above.
The flood of illegal immigrants is not only meant to tilt the balance of votes towards Dems, but to destabilize society in general, (fentanyl, COVID, jobs, crime, spies, parasites, etc.), beginning with a focus on red states. So that's where many of them are shipped.