&; can't wash your hands...(of this)

Mar 08, 2005 14:20

Happy Birthday iris_blue!

Annnd ( OMGWTFLOSTFINALESPOILERS!1! )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

scruffywesley March 8 2005, 21:02:10 UTC
I hope hope hope HOPE it's Sawyer. But I doubt it actually is. Le sigh. Are you sure it's not the hobbit?

Reply

lucki_neon March 8 2005, 21:15:47 UTC
The hobbit shall live forever! So sayeth JJ...and all the rabid fangirls.

Reply


featherfish March 8 2005, 21:09:51 UTC
Sawyer is a much higher possibility than Michael or Boone. Kristen, historically bad at hiding things, has made it obvious that it will either be Jack or Sawyer. But like I said, I'm almost sure it's Jack... though not so sure it'll be at Kate's hand. Kate may well have something to do with it, as will Locke (of course), but I just can't see Kate actually KILLING him.

And scruffywesley: Yes, it's not Charlie. This has been confirmed by many, many people affiliated with the show, just so none of us freak the heck out again. :-P

Reply

lucki_neon March 8 2005, 21:18:44 UTC
Yeah...that's true. But I just don't think Sawyer trusts anyone enough, and I don't see how he could play into it, seeing as Locke's involved now too. *shrugs*

I don't think Kate will actually KILL him, she's too...Kate to kill him. But I think she'll lie to him. It's Locke's fault in the way that something he's done is what snowballs the whole thing, I think. So, he could have done something and then Kate could lie and then Jack/Sawyer shall die. I bet they involve Kate just to play up the triangle o' demented love she has with Sawyer and Jack.

Reply

featherfish March 8 2005, 22:07:33 UTC
Sawyer does trust Kate, though he won't admit it, and I really wouldn't be surprised if Kate totally betrayed him and whatnot. Because you're right, either way it would play up the love triangle. And Locke's involvement is sketchy... but they did have that random-ass scene in Outlaws. Whatever.

It'll probably be Jack. But weeeee shall seeeee. Bets are still on, of course. Methinks I have a lot of work to do. But now I have PHOTOSHOP so it's okay because my icons won't suck. ;-)

Reply

lucki_neon March 8 2005, 22:20:44 UTC
True, true. I don't see why it has to go back to the triangle. I mean...isn't Kate angsty enough without gnawing guilt that comes along with killing off 1/3 of her triangle o' lurve? Alas.

I think Locke's involvement is going to be sketchy no matter who dies. I bet it has something to do with the hatch, because I heard Locke is somehow connect to the hatch...which goes back to those damned numbers.

Yay for photoshop!!

Reply


tigereyed24 March 8 2005, 22:50:32 UTC
I can't decide who it is. I want it to be Boone, because he bothers me. And Michael would make for some interesting story lines - but neither of them are really well-liked and big characters enough, as far as I'm concerned. I still think it might be Locke, because then someone else would have to fill his role and that could be interesting too - because, Walt or Boone? But, seeing as they say it's one of the biggest and most loved, I think it's either Jack or Sawyer. And I can't decide who I would rather have killed. *bits nails* But if Jack doesn't die, he is definately off trying to save the doomed person while Claire has her baby. And your delivery scene is perfect *snickers* Charlie will most definately be having a panic attack "OMG WHERE IS JAAAAAAAAAACK, WE CAN'T DELIVER THAT BABY! HEY YOU! MAN WITH THE KNIVES! STEP AWAAAAAAAY!"

Reply

lucki_neon March 9 2005, 00:42:06 UTC
Charlie will so be spazzing. "Are you sure you can do this? You know what you're doing?! Have you done this before? I can't do this. Oh God, I can't take this. Where's Jack?! We need Jack! He's a doctor!" *flails* Heehehe.

Reply

featherfish March 9 2005, 01:35:51 UTC
He trusts Locke... but he'll spaz. And it will be DELICIOUS.

Unless they're evil and he's not there for some reason or other. Which... I'm sure they wouldn't do. But seriously, how could they do it without making the unrequited love any MORE obvious?! :-P

RAAAAAJUSTKISSALREADY. *sigh*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up