hmmm. . .

[lonely_thinker]

since the bush administration began talking about invading iraq, it pushed two main lines of argument as justification. first, iraq needed regime change because the government there was amassing or had amassed weapons of mass destruction. second, iraq was likely to use those weapons against the u.s. or sell them to someone who would because it was part of the al qaeda-led jihad against the united states.

with the first argument largely discredited, the white house is holding on tenaciously to the second- tenaciously, but carefully. for the past year members of this administration have been dancing along the line of connecting, but not completely connecting, al qaeda and iraq.

why is my husband over there again?????