Personally I like religious political candidates. The ones that take their religion seriously and practice it seriously. I know that that will bring gasps of horror for the liberal side of my audience, but hear me out.
The vast majority of religions tell their believers to ‘be good, do good, be honest, and help other folk which will pay off for
(
Read more... )
Generally we adjust our perceptions of reality according to the feedback of those around us. If our views are too far out, we find ourselves shunned and avoided. Social outcasts. Unfortunately political candidates are surrounded by sycophants whose careers are closely tied to the success of their “idol” and so are not likely to argue with his or her view of reality.
Those outside of the candidate’s immediate circle also adjust their perceptions of reality to those of the candidate in order to preserve the elevated feelings of “specialness” that adherence to the candidate’s reality gives them. This is what following a political leader really is about - the candidate’s new view of reality justifying his or her follower’s failures as not being their own.
It’s about reality.
Have the words and actions of figures up on the movie screen ever emotionally moved you? Has your pulse ever been made to race? These actors and actresses are selling us a view of reality, a make-believe reality that we accept and react to for two hours. What political candidate would not give his/her eyeteeth for such acting skills to manipulate the citizenry for maybe four or more years? Perhaps honest politicians do not have the same level of entertaining us as do those skilled at lying.
So like the soothsayer in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” I say ‘Beware candidates who associate with such liars, for they are engaged in learning false arts.’ And that is something that any voter can use to gauge the “reality” being offered to us by any candidate.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment