1st footnote [text] an open letter

Sep 23, 2011 14:56

Dear Mr. Mandrake:

There is entirely too much form and substance here. Where's that blissful rest you promised? You'll give my essence an ulcer with all this existing you've subjected me to.

This is almost the most pathetic dismissal I've ever had the displeasure of enduring. 1 I must admit that I expected better of you after that ( Read more... )

!ic: text

Leave a comment

text thii2ii22tupiid September 23 2011, 22:05:30 UTC
*Wow there's a lot to go off here...*

who the fuck ii2 mandrake?

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 23 2011, 22:14:56 UTC
[It's Bartimaeus: He's always a handful. Just ask any magician that's summoned him and they'll confirm.]

Regrettably, Mr. Mandrake is a deplorable acquaintance of mine. 1

I don't suppose you've seen him? Not more than a child. Knee-high to a grasshopper and an ego the size of Big Ben?

1 - I use the term in the most insulting way. It's always good to clarify, because some sorts - myself included - take 'deplorable' as a compliment. I'd hate for him to think I was fond of him.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 23 2011, 22:17:02 UTC
no, he'2 probably not here.

why are you addiing extra note2?

*Because that's one annoying quirk.*

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 23 2011, 22:26:20 UTC
What excellent tidings, if borne on the wave of poor grammar! Though you would do a djinni good by not using '2' in any reference to him. The very idea of a second John Mandrake is enough to turn my essence inside out.

Quite the educational tool, aren't they? I recognise that few have the dearth of experience that I so modestly possess. The notes exist to bring you up to speed, as it were.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 23 2011, 22:37:49 UTC
iit2 not iin referance two anybody.

ii'm not 2ure mode2ty ii2 2omethiing you po22e22 at all.

what the hell ii2 a djiinii?

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 23 2011, 22:51:18 UTC
You have a remarkable propensity for making no reference with a reference. Why else plaster all your commentary with the digit?

Allow me to assure you that my modesty is both possessed and quite resilient. Five thousand years is a long time for it to toughen up and, like I, it has risen with style and grace to every task set before it.

And a djinni, my numerophiliatic friend, is nothing less than I. 2 Have you not heard of one before?

2 - To use myself as an introduction to the spirit class is, perhaps, cruel. There are so few djinni that equal me, after all. Prepare yourself, then, to be disappointed by other djinni you may encounter. Try to be kind - it's not their fault that they're not me.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 23 2011, 22:56:23 UTC
there'2 a rea2on, maybe you'll fiind iit out later.

*Just looking at him tends to give one an idea of it, really. Also he's just gonna skip that bit about modesty and being 5,000 years old and whatever the fuck that was supposed to mean.*

no, we diidn't have djiinii iin my uniiver2e and you're the only one here.

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 23 2011, 23:12:01 UTC
Or, you could save us both the roundabout and simply say why it is. Otherwise, I will be forced to concoct reasons to explain it. 3

Well, doesn't that make you the lucky one! Whatever you are and wherever we are.

3 - Devastating hand injury from when it was ravaged by a small, pink rabbit and the scribble is an unfortunate twitch; numerophilia, and the number 2 is indeed in the process of suing for slanderous references constantly made to it. A few examples of what could be a thousand reasons. They only get worse from here.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 23 2011, 23:14:46 UTC
no, ii thiink ii'll fiind iit more amu2iing two watch you come up wiith rea2ons.

*Cause those are kind of amusing, even if he's no idea what rabbits or suing are.*

you diidn't read the letter, diid you?

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 24 2011, 02:00:55 UTC
The only human writing worth paying attention to is that which makes up the lines of a pentacle. There rest tends to be pompous drivel, filled with one magician slandering another. Or, more commonly, that same magician lauding all his accomplishments. 4

[In short? Sure, but is he really expected to believe the letter?]

4 - They invariably forget to mention the spirits that were harmed in the attaining of said accomplishments. Given such blatant omissions, no spirit can be blamed for disbelieving human text. Who knows what they have neglected to say for the sake of making it sound good?

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 24 2011, 02:14:30 UTC
what?

*And you have completely lost him agian, good job!*

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 24 2011, 02:19:17 UTC
You've managed to comment without the number 2, congratulations! This is one step away from your addiction.

As to the rest, mysterious commentator, I read the note, but cannot be expected to take it at face value. Humans like to lie and a letter is just one more medium in which to do it.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 24 2011, 02:20:06 UTC
what make2 you thiink iit wa2 a human who wrote iit?

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 24 2011, 02:30:21 UTC
The pretentious requirement to use the term 'ontological' to explain anything. 5

I am actually of the opinion that this human is also a magician. Who else would be pompous enough to suggest he could re-weave the very fabric of worlds? Mark my text - there will be a thousand djinni summoned to do the job for him. That's how things go.

5 - Only humans equipped with very large dictionaries fall back on such language. They seem to think it makes them smarter. In truth, it just makes them heavier. Never try fleeing a hoard of foliots while carrying a dictionary-carrying magician - it never turns out well for the magician.

Reply

Re: text thii2ii22tupiid September 24 2011, 02:31:47 UTC
let me gue22, iin your world iit2 ju2t human2 and djiinii2.

Reply

text likesfootnotes September 24 2011, 02:43:56 UTC
[There's a delay in replying - the renewed onslaught of 2's threw him off and even the great djinni needs to puzzle that out.]

Hardly! There are humans, magicians, and spirits. 6

Humans, however, are the most populous and djinni the most meritorious.

6 Within the classification of spirits, there are the five mainstays (imp, foliot, djinni, afrit, and marid). Within that, the humans claim to have identified thirteen-thousand-and-forty-six classes. There aren't nearly that many of course; it's a tradition to convince every magician that they've discovered at least one new class each summoning. I myself convinced Ivan the Malleable of six in one sitting merely by pointing out six different dust bunnies under his desk and claiming they were all different spirits in disguise.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up