Review of half of "Fifty Shades of Grey"

Sep 18, 2012 11:53

I'm attending a slash event (not a convention, it's not really big enough for that) at the end of the month, and in preparation for it I'm reading Fifty Shades of Grey. ( Discussions of a below the belt nature, possibly TMI for some. )

reading, conventions, fandom

Leave a comment

Comments 8

mcamy September 18 2012, 16:39:57 UTC
It was so crap, but it was like crack to me. Like watching a bad soap opera that was so bad it was enjoyable. If I could write something like this and make so much money with it, I would totally do it.

Reply

lexin September 18 2012, 20:21:17 UTC
Well, yes, if I could write something like that I totally would, too. But I hope mine would be a bit better!

Reply

shezan September 23 2012, 05:41:27 UTC
Yours would be MILES better. Which would probably be the problem.

Reply


randy_o September 18 2012, 23:23:03 UTC
You probably already know that Fifty Shades of Grey was originally a very AU Twilight fanfiction series. The author just changed the names of her protagonists and a few other details and sold the story commercially.

I haven't read FSoG, although I've skimmed a bit of the original fanfiction. I'm amazed that anyone buys this crap.

But coincidentally, I've just gotten round to holding my nose and reading Anne Rice's Sleeping Beauty trilogy, which dates back to 1984. I rather think we have Rice to blame for the trope that every 'erotic' story must have a very strong D/s undertone. I found certain phrases that set my teeth on edge in later works, including the description of the female protagonist as 'spoilt' and the idea that crawling around naked and having one's arse paddled daily will result in one being 'greatly enhanced in wisdom and self-control'.

Don't be looking for any kind of logic in this kind of fiction. It's pure fantasy.

Reply

lexin September 19 2012, 10:30:31 UTC
I did know that FSoG was Twilight fanfic, I'm just not sure that the person who asked me to read it in preparation for the discussion did. I shall find out when I get there.

I've never read Anne Rice, but I have to say that the D/s trope does worry me rather. It's like they believe women can only be fulfilled in the presence of the stunt cock, and while I'm not sure the writer intends that to be taken seriously, some people do seriously believe it. Honestly - google "quiverful" if you don't believe me.

Reply

randy_o September 19 2012, 17:26:23 UTC
Don't bother reading Anne Rice. She seems to have dashed this trilogy off just to make a quick buck.

I'm sure you recall my freak-out over a story that seems to have been patterned after Rice, right down the the use of 'spoilt' to describe anyone who likes to retain a shred of personal dignity. I've since learned (or should I say 'learnt'?) toread this sort of thing with a clinical detachment.

You're right -- it sets people's teeth on edge to see women being used this way as if it's a good thing, and it troubles me to see our 'erotic' tastes molded in this way.

But have no fear -- Rice is equal opportunity in this regard. In fact she seems to prefer writing about the men finding joy in submitting utterly to one another. She's also more interested in the spanking than the sex. The various paddlings get the most description, while the coitus is often glossed over as an afterthought.

Reply


catalenamara September 23 2012, 19:48:17 UTC
Congratulations. I made it through the first chapter and had to stop.

Reply

lexin September 23 2012, 21:13:02 UTC
I am currently three quarters of the way through, and very tempted to stop there. It's awful.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up