(Untitled)

Oct 24, 2007 10:01

there has been a noticable difference in the responses between the katrina disaster and the california fires ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

ex_interim3 October 24 2007, 17:33:33 UTC
plus, the fires are much more localized than katrina, which hit along the whole coast. neighboring communities (like los angeles) can offer assistance in the fires, but who was neighboring and unaffected by katrina? houston was closest, but nobody could get into the area for quite a while.

fires aren't hurricanes--they don't destroy infrastructure. and california isn't louisiana--it isn't poor and isolated. and rich people aren't poor--they can leave.

Reply

placeslost October 24 2007, 17:54:11 UTC
"...rich people aren't poor..." Such an amazing insight, I woulda never guessed.

Reply

kelley779 October 24 2007, 17:54:48 UTC
lol i had the exact same thought process when i read that.

and robert is one of my smartest friends!

Reply

ex_interim3 October 24 2007, 18:07:56 UTC
it was rhetorical and you know it. the point was that the poor people of new orleans were pretty much stranded in their city. san diegoans, on average, had the resources to leave and did (except for those at the stadium). people who left from new orleans were called "refugees." i haven't heard that word for san diego people yet.

FEMA and other relief and rescue services face significantly different challenges in the fire zone than they did on the Gulf Coast in 2005 ( ... )

Reply

ex_interim3 October 24 2007, 18:00:06 UTC
good thing i wrote it, then.

Reply

placeslost October 24 2007, 18:12:58 UTC
Yeah, us less smart people, need people with smarts to teach us facts, and other things.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up