Gender

Jun 10, 2016 19:54

For reasons that don't need exploring at this juncture, this past Sunday about five minutes after I got up I was presented by my uncle with a retirement visioning exercise that involved doing the if-you-could-invite-anyone-to-dinner thought experiment at different points in your life. I eventually refused to do it on the basis that I felt uncomfortable and also I didn't want to, but my parents completed it. Their answers ended up going something like this:

MY FATHER: Well, for this time period I invited my parents, because I miss them and I'd like them to see how I'm doing, and also Arnold Palmer because they both really liked golf and I think they'd enjoy meeting him.

MY MOTHER: For this time period I invited my brother [n.b. the oldest one, who she liked to argue with about politics], Gandhi, and Hitler. Let's put 'em in a room together and see what happens!

MY FATHER: For this time period I invited my kids and my wife, because they're the people I want around me at the end of my life.

MY MOTHER: I'm inviting Jesus, the Pope, and Martin Luther. Let's do this thing. [n.b. my mother is an atheist]

I'm just saying, despite a family setup that was traditional in many ways, it was not exactly an upbringing that led to a lot of gender essentialist ideas about who is and is not confrontational.

(I think there is a better than 50% chance that she listed Hitler mainly to mess with my uncle, but the "Dad sets up thoughtful dinner parties where everyone will have a nice time, Mom sets up something between an intellectual Parisian salon and Thunderdome" contrast was still pretty funny. So now all of you get to enjoy it too.)
Previous post Next post
Up