(no subject)
Harrumph.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-decision27-2009may27,0,6677891.story
And yet...
"...the justices were unanimous in deciding to keep intact the marriages of as many as 18,000 gay couples who exchanged vows before the election."
This decision is disappointing, but it's only the end of round one. Everyone back to your corners, and it's time for round two when this goes on the ballot again in November. And if it doesn't pass, again after that. We might not be able to outspend the bigots, but we can outwait them. >:)
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-decision27-2009may27,0,6677891.story
And yet...
"...the justices were unanimous in deciding to keep intact the marriages of as many as 18,000 gay couples who exchanged vows before the election."
This decision is disappointing, but it's only the end of round one. Everyone back to your corners, and it's time for round two when this goes on the ballot again in November. And if it doesn't pass, again after that. We might not be able to outspend the bigots, but we can outwait them. >:)