As a former awards administrator for two literary societies, I continue to be fascinated by the Oscars snafu this year. There are two outstanding questions in my mind: 1) how and why was Warren Beatty handed the wrong envelope?; 2) why did it take so long for the PwC awards administrators, who have memorized all the winners precisely to prevent
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Curiously enough, this article says they changed the design this year and shows how much larger the envelope labels were in previous years. (Sorry, you'll likely have to click ads shut to see the full image on most of the photographic examples.
Reply
If the bad design of the envelopes did contribute to the error, then it surely was - as the article you link to suggests - because it was difficult for the PwC people backstage to see which envelope they had, rather than with directly confusing the presenters. My suggestion, of course, is that if Beatty (or Dunaway) could have seen "Best Actress" on the card, he'd have realized what the problem was, and the same applies if he'd seen it on the envelope.
Reply
As you pointed out, the teeny italics on the bottom of the interior card are all but useless as any sort of confirmation check for the presenters.
In my less than humble opinion, they'd also be safer using upper and lower case letters rather than all caps throughout.
Reply
Interestingly, I found this article linked to by Mark Evanier, who'd received the link from Neil Gaiman.
Reply
Reply
Reply
But it doesn't explain why he was given the wrong one. The answer to that seems to lie in a combination of poor labeling of the outside of the envelope, and of the PwC guy being distracted because he was too busy tweeting backstage photos. If the latter was responsible, then he should be sentenced to four years of scrubbing toilets, or possibly working in Trump's Treasury Department.
Reply
Thank you for this analysis; I am both enjoying it and finding it illuminating.
Reply
Leave a comment