Sep 20, 2004 19:36
For those who have seen it, please respond!
1. What do you think of the carpets in the Seattle Public Library? Specifically the ones with the huge botanical prints?
2. Has anyone seen the auditorium curtain? Touched it? Thoughts?
Sorry if I blathered on in my last post, but I want you to share your reactions!
Please?
Leave a comment
Comments 20
Reply
The carpet I helped design for the Toronto airport was a very subtle monolithic that contained multiple shades of close-valued greys, which actually achieves the same stain-hiding/wear resistance as the obnoxious colored/patterned stuff. There are designers working on improving these things!
Did you see the pics of the carpets I'm talking about in the last post I made? (the one in the comments section is a good aerial view)
Reply
I haven't noticed the carpets, much.
The curtain is, if I recall correctly, smooth and cream on one side--it looks like vinyl--and shaggy green/blue/white fibers on the other side. It looks like a humongous terrycloth towel, if that helps, but the long threads lay pretty flat. It's almost always roped off so I haven't been able to touch it.
Reply
If you want to take pics, that's cool, but there are lots of them in the design magazines right now. What I was curious about was what I can't see in a picture, which is how they intgrate with the environment.
It may be that I am not getting much response because they are so well integrated with the design that they do not stand out as a separate element! And that's the kind of thing you can't tell from a picture, you know?
So actually, you telling me you haven't noticed the carpets is exactly what I was looking for! Thank you!
Also, the fuzzy side of the curtain looks brown in the pics and the smooth side looks green/blue/white, so that's good to know they are both colorful. Did you know that one side reflects, and the other absorbs sound? So cool!
Thank you so much for sharing! :)
Reply
It looks like a fucking dance club.
Reply
Reply
And I still love the screaming chartreuse escalators.
But I am deeply disgusted with some other, less noticeable aspects of the place.
Hey, I still wouldn't kick Rem Koolhaas out of bed or anything silly like that.
And it's not his fault. I refuse to believe it's his fault. It just can't be. But someone really blew it in a few areas. The work spaces around The Infernal Machine are naaaassssty industrial-in-a-bad-way. It's an unpleasant, grinding, stressful, and ugly space. No thought seems to have been given to the human beings who work there for hours. The "SHO" room (get it, like an auto plant, ha ha... ha...) is bleak and cold, a horridly "functional" place - again, no consideration of how depressing it must be to spend hours in this ugly, windowless room.
They seem to have cranked the air a bit, but, stupidly, the 1st floor circ desk was built without air vents precisely where people are working hardest and need them most, making it prone to dead, stale air. ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
When I first read about the vocera, this was exacly my fear.
The stress is literally making people sick, breaking them.
This is horrible. This is the hallmark of the worst type of design. Sick Building Syndrome. No pretty carpet or graphic wayfinding can ever make up for this.
Reply
Reply
the library at my school is designed aesthetically in a way that appears very beautiful, but the chairs are uncomfortable and the vent system roars in an annoying way.
back when i did my undergrad, i would spend hours at the microfiche machines in the basement of the library of mt. holyoke. Just me, alone in the dark of that great big castle-like library with all the images of century-old newspapers whizzing by on film...
Prints like the carpets in the pictures would be fun to screenprint, wouldn't they?
Have you ever thought about screenprinting fabric yardage or wallpapers?
Reply
Leave a comment