More stuff coming out on the octuplet stuff.
The dirty secret that many fertility clinics don’t want people to notice is that they sell hope by the very expensive bucketful, and their stats / success rate is actually worse than advertised if you can get past the caveats and BS. But if the people don’t have hope, they won’t come into the clinic,
(
Read more... )
Comments 28
Me too. I just don't see how 14 children that close in age can have a very good life...
Reply
Reply
I know my Grandma had a happy upbringing as one of ten children on a farm in County Durham, but they were spread out over 17 years and I know her oldest brother paid for some things for her when she was in grammar school (she was second or third youngest). Things were simpler in those days anyway, as she's 98 this month...
Reply
My pediatric pharmacist collegue says it is a MIRACLE that these kids are in as good a shape as they are. He says it's not uncommon for even twins or triplets to spend weeks on a ventilator, rather than being on and off in a matter of days and several never having been on one to begin with.
OTOH, the more I hear about this case, the madder I get. Unlike Jim, I don't think there will be criminal prosecution regarding the doc who did the IVFs. It's a very unregulated industry because there are a limited number of good scientific studies on what works and what doesn't. My friend who underwent IVF a few years ago said she was told absolutely no more embryos than 3 at a time, because of the possibility of doubling in vivo.
But...the doctors certainly should have questioned the wisdom of doing IVF on a woman who already had 6 babies.
Reply
While a little taxpayer outrage in this case might be good, shouldn't information about her disability case be confidential. I don't think it's right of the LA Times/media to flag all that.
It's also funny/interesting to me, how in current American hyperpsychoanalyzed, media-aware, reality TV culture people just know how to say all the right things in an interview while being totally wrong in many ways.
The danger with the taxpayer outrage as I see it is this could turn into a crusade against single mothers and poor families on welfare or social assistance at the very time that many families may really and legitimately need more help or need help for the first time. Is she the new Cadillac driving welfare queen for folks on the right and even the middle? Because she has made herself into a very good (if inaccurate) poster mother for welfare reform if nothing else.
Reply
Welfare in the USA is not something that pays for anything resembling a lavish lifestyle; it's subsistence at best.
Reply
I read your response as maybe slightly defensive, though I honestly can't tell if it was meant to be (or really if anyone else would read it that way). So I'm adding that I didn't think you personally were letting bandits off the hook while targeting welfare moms (of multiple birth babies). I was elaborating on my own thoughts that came from reading your interesting post.
Reply
Reply
You know, we have a sect up here who don't believe in birth control and where multiple births run in the families. It is not unusual for a woman to have 10 -14 kids 8 and under. Yes, having 8 babies is mind boggling, but it's not impossible if you have a support system... and it sounds as if her family and church are helping.
I had a kid in my class who had 18 brothers and sisters, and, when his aunt and uncle were killed in a car crash, his parents took their 10 children. In a 3 bedroom farm house. No big.
This situation just has more publicity because of the 8 at once. When she goes off the national radar, I expect the kids will be fine.
Reply
I haven't heard about her church helping. I'm all for people helping out other people, but I'm not so charitable about helping out people who are doing really reckless things and expect that someone's going to fish them out because they always have - which is one of the things I hated about Dubya.
Reply
Check out Finnish Apostolic.
Reply
Reply
The hypocrisy surrounding this astounds me! Yeah, the doc involved is self-serving and may indeed be seen to have violated various tax codes and maybe some medical ones as well, but it's still a private choice and suddenly saying that reproductive privacy extends only to people you think deserve it is wrong.
All that said, should their be more oversight into the huge business that is reproductive medicine? Absolutely. The way to do that though is not to string this woman up by her toes.
imho
Reply
Reply
Same thing with the doc. If this was Angelina Jolie and she was well-off but looney (think Michael Jackson's kids or Mia Farrow's 15 kids - some bio, most adopted) the most that would happen is that they'd shake their heads and roll their eyes. But the question is - where did the money for the IVFs come from? Did the Doc eat it? Did he charge the state of California and lie about it? Did he fake her costs into costs for other people? Hard to say. (When we went through IVF stuff, it cost about $10000 a try, and insurance paid for it.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment