So it's tax time, but the forms have all been e-shipped to the appropriate e-destinations, so I thought I would try to figure out just what percentage of my income really goes to taxes. This is not trivial
( Read more... )
Interesting calculation. Mine was 22.5% allowing 1% for nuisance and sales taxes. Adding 25% of pretax retirement contributions gives 27.0%, which I guess is pretty average according to the chart.
The fair market value of your house wouldn't change your taxes much, since tax rates would be proportionately lower. In some states the valuation is pegged at 50% of actual value for instance.
If that were true they would have never passed it in the first place.
Are you saying that tax rates would automatically adjust? I thought the tax rate was set, and to change it would require legislative or voter approval.
At least here (AZ), they figure out how much they need in taxes and then divide that by the total assessed value to get a rate. So when my assessed value goes down (as it has each year for the last three years) the tax rate goes up, leaving the tax paid about the same.
Well, yes, but voters would already have done this. If the valuation system was different, then the tax rates would also be different to arrive at the same final amount.
In a vacuum, of course, you would not be pleased with reverting to full value over some %, although Cali already is using full value and auto-adjusting the value every year - My house valuation was over $700k and is now down to $399k. This is a serious problem in most locales, who expected the higher revenues.
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
Are you saying that tax rates would automatically adjust? I thought the tax rate was set, and to change it would require legislative or voter approval.
Reply
Reply
In a vacuum, of course, you would not be pleased with reverting to full value over some %, although Cali already is using full value and auto-adjusting the value every year - My house valuation was over $700k and is now down to $399k. This is a serious problem in most locales, who expected the higher revenues.
Reply
Leave a comment