My LJ: Pay Per View - your thoughts?

Apr 01, 2010 11:35

I've always been opposed to LJ charging for user-created content. For one, LJ wouldn't exist if we wouldn't provide content, and for the other - why would I want LJ to profit off my writing?

However, I like the plans to give users the possibility to make money with their own content. I don't like ads, and my own LJ is ads free, but if somebody wants to put ads in their own entries and make a bit of money when people click the sponsors, that's fine for me.

The new "Pay Per View" option which will become available from June for those of us with a permanent or a paid account takes things a step further, though. You'll be able to label each entry as "free" or "PPV"; if it's the latter, people will have to pay to read what you've written. I don't know yet if there will be a fixed fee, if there's a limit for what you can charge, what the payment options are etc., but while I was "d'oh?" at first, I've warmed up to the idea. I don't expect to become rich on LJ, but who knows, maybe I could make a bit of extra dough?

So here's my (rough draft) of a payment model for "Joyful Molly". This is the result of overnight-brainstorming, so please feel free to yay or nay at your heart's delight:

Free
  • All private entries (who'd pay for reading my whining, anyway!)
  • Fanfic
  • Resource links
  • Politics, entertainment etc.
  • Screencaps, low resolution

PPV normal (minimum fee possible)
  • Book reviews
  • DVD reviews
  • Screencaps, high resolution
  • Fannish meta

PPV de luxe (higher fee, depending on content)
  • Original writing
  • In-depth articles with pictures etc.
  • Travel reports
  • Screencaps of Andrew Buchan, James D'Arcy or Jack Davenport sans shirt (HD)

Your thoughts? And what would you consider "fair" payment?

lj, meta, private

Previous post Next post
Up