Introduction
There's been a lot of talk about the list of likely Republican Presidential candidates for 2012 being disappointing. I know I'm disappointed: I see no one who I would describe as even remotely "libertarian" who is not simultaneously isolationist to the point of trying to deny the existence of the rest of the world beyond American
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
People like to hammer with me that I am so selfish and self interested, things are always 'about me', but when you cannot secure your own immediate safety and health. How do you proceed with planning farther ahead? It's fairly hard to override this low level urge.
Reply
The lawsuit reform and opening competition across state lines should lower premiums as well.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Of course, it's perfectly reasonable to want to secure your own immediate safety and health, and it's meant to be a low-level urge. However, when I seek to secure my own immediate safety and health (and there have been times when I have needed to do so) I have never contemplated that the best and/or only way to do so is to order the government to force other people to hand it to me for free.
My attempts to secure safety/health have always involved seeing what I could do to secure these important things and who would be willing to help me of their own accord.
Reply
Look, my medical bills tend to be on average three to four times my take home pay. That is to say, in one year, I will rack up enough medical bills to completely spend FOUR years of my income.
Exactly who am I supposed to go to get that much covered besides the government? Because I sure as heck don't know.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I have to wonder why... Hmm, no wait, no I don't! Because I'm sure that they're big evil bigoted Republican doctors who are MEAN MEAN MEAN to transgenders and keeping them from going to whichever bathroom you want to go to. Which, by the way, I'm totally vague on. Even after your lengthy several comments replies which made no explanation to melvin_udall regarding his question as to HOW your being assaulted outside a bathroom by a bigot equates to the Republicans denying you access to said bathrooms and ( ... )
Reply
I'm not going to dignify the rest with a response.
Reply
Naturally you won't, since I did the you the favor of parsing it down and translating from your diatribe, cutting through the bullshit and laying it out that you haven't got facts to back up your assertions with. You're welcome, by the way.
Reply
As to why things continue to redirect into my history, it's very, very easy to explain this.
Person X asks what it would take for me to vote Republican.
I answer
Person X asks why my answer is that.
I answer
You do this once or twice and you will hit the issue. I could accept the GOP's agenda if only for their GLBT stances. I used to vote for them fairly often. If that was dropped from the platform, I'd vote for them in a second.
Did you know I voted for Bush both times? Somehow I suspect you won't believe me on this one sadly.
Reply
I don't really have any reason to believe you, given that you have repeatedly 1) contradicted yourself 2)outright lied 3)refuse to answer direct questions 4) never given proof of your assertions and claims. You constantly reach into events that happened ages ago and describe them as if they happened recently and use them as examples of political oppression or religious oppression of YOU when in fact, they aren't, from your own admission.
And on the very first statement you outright lied again.
Here:
In general the GOP wants to force me into the men's room for necessary matters. The last two times I tried to comply with this fact in a red state, I was assaulted. One time involved me beaten even worse than that video meme of the attack in the McDonald's. The right side of my face is partially paralyzed to this day as a result of the attack.
Yet you assert that you don't blame republicans:
No, I don't ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment