Hausdorff dimentia
--
hehehe... wouldn't it be kinda interesting if the plural for "dimension" was "dimentia"? might it not explain a bit about schizophrenia? singular = "schizophrenion"? ... kinda like phenomen-a/on?
i know i have the personal discipline of a frat party and the attention span of its most obliteratedly sodden, hazing-victimized, freshman pledge, but i am feeling that, in my own way, i am coming closer and closer to a modeled concept for describing how the brain interprets signals from an multi-dimensional frequency realm and assists in mapping out our apparent four-plus dimensional world.
as a personal hypothesis, i suggest that prime number generation, on a mechanical-structural level, provides a framework for fixing perceptions in our four-dimensional world. organization of the neocortex in our brains and the function of spatial and temporal memory formation/information storage-retrieval within the neocortex may operate on the same level that fixes non-trivial zeroes on the Riemannian "critical line." i further suggest that this fixation happens after the manner of frequency modulation of the type suggested by certain aspects of the holographic principle wherein fractal branes/strings connect or project from a multi-dimensional anti-de Sitter space and their information is interpreted by our brains and fixed into our perceptual four-dimensional model of the universe. clarity of signal is key to why we use a prime number generational method of information processing - nothing to confuse with the source and the signal recipient. (it is of course rather evident that amongst signal recipients there is a great deal of confusion but only when they compare relative signals. but in terms of the type of invariant representation that goes on in the upper-hierarchical structure of the neocortex, feedback given into our perceptions of the simpler four-dimensional universe is kept somewhat more focused. this is of course the more speculative-philosophical side of the hypothesis)
of course as to why this is so, i don't believe i have the foggiest or even the second-foggiest notion, so certainly my sense of "closer and closer" is really awfully, woefully far away. Add to that the fact i can not derive any really predictive value out of this hypothesis, and you get a better idea of how far off i am.
but i'm having a hoot nonetheless...
hehehe... wouldn't it be kinda interesting if the plural for "dimension" was "dimentia"? might it not explain a bit about schizophrenia? singular = "schizophrenion"? ... kinda like phenomen-a/on?
i know i have the personal discipline of a frat party and the attention span of its most obliteratedly sodden, hazing-victimized, freshman pledge, but i am feeling that, in my own way, i am coming closer and closer to a modeled concept for describing how the brain interprets signals from an multi-dimensional frequency realm and assists in mapping out our apparent four-plus dimensional world.
as a personal hypothesis, i suggest that prime number generation, on a mechanical-structural level, provides a framework for fixing perceptions in our four-dimensional world. organization of the neocortex in our brains and the function of spatial and temporal memory formation/information storage-retrieval within the neocortex may operate on the same level that fixes non-trivial zeroes on the Riemannian "critical line." i further suggest that this fixation happens after the manner of frequency modulation of the type suggested by certain aspects of the holographic principle wherein fractal branes/strings connect or project from a multi-dimensional anti-de Sitter space and their information is interpreted by our brains and fixed into our perceptual four-dimensional model of the universe. clarity of signal is key to why we use a prime number generational method of information processing - nothing to confuse with the source and the signal recipient. (it is of course rather evident that amongst signal recipients there is a great deal of confusion but only when they compare relative signals. but in terms of the type of invariant representation that goes on in the upper-hierarchical structure of the neocortex, feedback given into our perceptions of the simpler four-dimensional universe is kept somewhat more focused. this is of course the more speculative-philosophical side of the hypothesis)
of course as to why this is so, i don't believe i have the foggiest or even the second-foggiest notion, so certainly my sense of "closer and closer" is really awfully, woefully far away. Add to that the fact i can not derive any really predictive value out of this hypothesis, and you get a better idea of how far off i am.
but i'm having a hoot nonetheless...