I can name SFX guys, but most of them are CGI rather than the stop-motion that made Harryhausen a worldwide name and to be honest I don't rate the CGI stuff at the same level as Harryhausen.
When it comes to non-CGI there's no-one that's got the exposure level that Harryhausen has, mainly because of the iconic look of his work, but there are a couple I can think of.
Nick Park is the first; well-known, award-winning, and also gets a decent level of name-checking. (Either him, or his Aardman Animations company.)
Henry Selick/Tim Burton are there too, although people tend to think of the films they make rather than the animation itself.
Mike Jittlov is the final one. Personally I think he's one of the most creative SFX people I've seen, but he's nowhere near the exposure level that Harryhausen/Park have.
Comments 8
When it comes to non-CGI there's no-one that's got the exposure level that Harryhausen has, mainly because of the iconic look of his work, but there are a couple I can think of.
Nick Park is the first; well-known, award-winning, and also gets a decent level of name-checking. (Either him, or his Aardman Animations company.)
Henry Selick/Tim Burton are there too, although people tend to think of the films they make rather than the animation itself.
Mike Jittlov is the final one. Personally I think he's one of the most creative SFX people I've seen, but he's nowhere near the exposure level that Harryhausen/Park have.
Reply
I don't connect Tim Burton and SFX at all though.
And I'm not surprised you could name Mike Jittlov :-) I on the other hand, couldn't put a name to the film.
Reply
Reply
I think Jester meant he knew the film name, but couldn't put Mike's name to it.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Though even the studios don't get namechecked the same way in listings (I'm not counting "A Disney-Pixar film" as the same thing)
Reply
Reply
This probably suggests I need to rewatch a couple of films :-)
Reply
Leave a comment