Lead hazards in books (heads-up for concerned US readers)

Apr 03, 2009 18:31

Okay, do you all remember my post about new safety regulations in the States causing children's books printed before 1985 to be taken off shelves?

Here's a followup, from a Slate.com blog:

U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., introduced legislation on Tuesday to exclude so-called "ordinary" books [from these new regulations]. Let's all send him an ( Read more... )

usa, books, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 4

astrogirl2 April 4 2009, 01:51:42 UTC
What's the difference between an ordinary and a non-ordinary book?

Reply

izhilzha April 4 2009, 02:14:29 UTC
Heh, I'm not sure. I'm hoping it's something like "ordinary"=regular books to be read, including picture books, while non-ordinary are, say, those thick cardboard toddler books, which are expected to be chewed on and thus a tiny fraction more likely to actually *be* a hazard if there is lead in the paint or the ink.

I'm trying to track down the Slate.com article, and will post a link here when I find it.

Reply


eldritchhobbit April 4 2009, 01:57:47 UTC
Thanks a million for this!

Reply


scionofgrace April 4 2009, 21:17:56 UTC
I do like it when I can be proud of my state.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up