Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 17:00:37 UTC
Then you are an idiot and someone needs to take your broad paintbrush away from you.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 17:41:18 UTC
The difference is that they are different. What I am talking about is a relationship between an immortal and a human. Werewolves need not apply.

The word non-human is insulting.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 17:49:54 UTC
Much as I think I may despise you, you do make me laugh.

I will remember to rip your tongue out if you attempt it. The idea that you are lumping all beings into two types, either human or not human, is insulting because it suggests that there are only two ways of being; human or not human. I don't want to be lumped with weres.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 18:00:20 UTC
No.

There are not a 'ton of different categories.' A dichotomy is a dichotomy. I have nothing against weres beyond that they aren't my immediate concern. You are a fucking idiot.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 18:40:36 UTC
Your failure to understand that you're suggesting a dangerous dichotomy is why you're an idiot.

My objections to this kind of mixed relationship are grounded in solid reason. But I am looking for insight. I wouldn't have asked if I wasn't.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 19:01:52 UTC
Your failure to realize that you are a hypocrite makes you entertaining.

Because they have little in common.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 19:25:22 UTC
I won't deny it.

No. It isn't subjective. They have little in common.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

itextedyou August 10 2009, 19:44:37 UTC
That was my point. You can't have much of a relationship if you don't have things in common.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up