Maidan protesters never fired at other maidan protesters how this is misrepresented by Katchanovski

Mar 19, 2022 14:59

Ivan Katchanovski states that maidan protesters had weapons and fired from maidan controlled locations. Indeed, it could be seen on few videos that some maidan protesters had some weapons and fired from maidan controlled locations at the government police and security forces including Berkut police. Maidan protesters never deny that they had some ( Read more... )

maidan, фальсифікації, euromaidan, ukraine, Майдан, Іван Качановський, welcome, maidan massacre, “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan, Євромайдан, livejournal, falsifications, ivan katchanovski falsifier, Революція Гідності, ivan katchanovski

Leave a comment

i_katchanovski May 5 2022, 21:15:55 UTC
Your comment contains multiple false statements and errors, not my statement.

This tree that you referred in your comment was hit by the bullet shot from the Berkut police concrete barricade. Many photos of two bullet holes
on this tree evidence the fact that this tree was shot not from the Hotel Ukraina but from the Berkut concrete barricade:
https://i-katchanovski.livejournal.com/861.html

A German film crew shines green laser through a bullet's pathway in another tree, and this tree was also shot from the opposite direction - the direction of the Berkut police concrete barricade. It can be easily proved that this tree was hit by the bullet from the Berkut concrete barricade. Look and examine a bullet canal that runs narrow from the direction of the Berkut police barricade and widens at the end. It means that the bullet hit the tree from the Berkut police barricade. Every forensic expert will prove this.

There are a lot of evidences and testimonies that maidan protesters were killed and wounded by the government police and security forces including the Berkut police unit. Ivan Katchanovski knows about them. But he carefully avoids and ignores these contrary evidences in his "research" that is actually a pseudo scientific research. A honest researcher must be impartial and unprejudiced in his study. He must consider all evidences including opposite and contrary evidences. Ivan Katchanovski intentionally omits opposite and contrary evidences that maidan protesters were shot by the government police and security forces including Berkut police unit.

Ivan Katchanovski claims that the Maidan protesters were massacred by snipers positioned within Maidan-controlled buildings and not by government snipers or Berkut (riot).
https://johnmenadue.com/ivan-katchanovski-the-hidden-origin-of-the-escalating-ukraine-russian-conflict-the-maidan-massacre/

Ivan Katchanovski does not provide photos of maidan protesters at the times when they were shot. He solely relies on the stories of other maidan protesters and other peoples. The steep directions of the maidan protesters wounds could be attributed to their inclined body positions at the moments when they were shot.

Which a professor's video shows that this group of protesters is massacred when they are immobile, crouched behind their shields as they are picked off?
If you read the Ivan Katchanovski papers, you know that he refers to many other episodes, not to any one video, when he attributes the shootings of maidan protesters from top directions.

Most importantly, bullets were removed from the bodies of many murdered and wounded maidan protesters and forensic examinations prove that these bullets were shot from the automatic rifles of the government police including Berkut police unit. Ivan Katchanovski on purpose avoids these facts in his "research" that has nothing to do with academic research and science. You can not answer the question: how it turn out that forensic examinations prove that bullets extracted from maidan protesters bodies were shot from the rifles of the government police including the Berkut police unit?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up