Comments | hogwarts_hocus: Secrets post 5!

dice_addict in hogwarts_hocus

Secrets post 5!

Sep 16, 2006 00:14

There is a noticeboard up outside the Great Hall and one by one, images are appearing pinned to the corkboard, with students tacking up thoughts on the images on index cards. Nobody can ever catch anyone posting an image, only the comments, and there is no way to use magic or science to know who posted what.

( OOC: what is this thing and what are the rules? )

secret

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 04:04:06 UTC

( ... )

Re: 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 04:22:31 UTC

What if they want to be there? Is that a possibility?

ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 04:40:16 UTC

If they did... If they did, then I'd be chuffed beyond measure. But I'm realistic. And, even if I thought they might want to, I couldn't ask that of them.

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 08:34:09 UTC

Is "chuffed," like, a really common word for you guys?

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 09:14:07 UTC

Er...yes. Sorry. I...should actually know better by now. The American equivalent would be 'stoked', I believe, if that helps? Excited, ecstatic, that sort of thing. Or a gesture to show the same emotion would be a 'thumbs up'. (I've been studying American slang.)

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 09:52:31 UTC

...you are such a nerd.

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 17:57:05 UTC

Well, yes. But I prefer to think of it as one of my more endearing qualities.

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 18:29:12 UTC

Don't worry, it is.

So. I'm... going to go ahead and guess this is you? And me?

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 19:29:44 UTC

...I do suppose so. As long as you are the you I'm thinking of.

Sodding anonymous secrets.

Re: ReL 35129 anonymous September 16 2006, 21:30:24 UTC

Well, I... think I am, at least. Unless there's a whole lot going on I don't know about.

It's not Chocolate Cookie Guy, is it? I feel like I have to at least check.

::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 21:49:21 UTC

Yes, it's you.

...So. Yeah. I guess here is where I launch into the big 'I just wanted you to know, but you don't have to say anything, we never even have to talk about it' speech, eh?

Oh, for Merlin's sake. Not even remotely.

Re: ::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 22:07:07 UTC

Boy oh boy, you have some interesting timing.

Look, I'm... not really sure what I want to say yet, and I definitely do not want to say it here. Can you give me a little time?

Had to make sure.

Re: ::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 22:14:28 UTC

Well, I do try.

I wasn't expecting anything, to be honest, so the...the fact that you acknowledged this is...well, let's just say I'm surprised. And you know you never need to feel obligated with me, yeah? So take time. Take as much as you need. I meant it when I said we never have to talk about this. Whatever you want, whatever you need, you can have it.

Trust me, he's got nothing on you. Not by a long shot.

Re: ::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 22:18:30 UTC

You really are amazing. I will tell you that.

So do I get to find out who it is any time soon?

Re: ::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 22:21:52 UTC

Glad you realize it. You're none to shabby, yourself.

I've already forgotten. That's how good you are.

Re: ::screened for the two "anons":: anonymous September 16 2006, 22:23:48 UTC

Okay, I know you're lying, but I'll accept that answer for now.

Back to all threads