[Penciled in after original post]
Please don't take this seriously. I know I didn't.
Goldilocks and the Three Bears.
Fox (vixen) = Old woman = Silver-locks = Gold-locks (prettier) = Goldilocks (nicer sounding)
Girl/fox/old woman walks in, girl/fox/old woman contaminates and devours food, girl/fox/old woman breaks-in two chairs and breaks one, girl/fox
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I was going to add in a bit about the bears talking and making porridge but the entire thing would have lasted pages, and I didn't have the patience or the current attention span to complete an entire overview.
Reply
I think the phrase you're looking for is a 'delusional pseudo-intellectual,' actually. There's nothing even remotely practical about pulling apart little moralistic ditties--just as there's nothing practical about Literary Criticism as a whole. Trust me, I would know.
This entire conversation reminds me of one I had with that Tweed boy the other day; in other words, thank you for not extending the torture.
Reply
Just as there is nothing practical about our existence in general. I believe the only time that it is right for someone to tell another person to stop picking apart their tale is when they seize to be.
So, I may be a 'delusional pseudo-intellectual' but I have a hell of a time being one.
Not a problem!
Reply
Oh, goody!
Reply
I did not insult you. Do not insult me.
Reply
---Ah, but I give those out for free.
Reply
Honestly, does any part of the evaluation of my Tale seem serious? I'll answer that for you, no. I was merely having a good time with it. We are allowed to do that, after all.
Reply
Leave a comment