Some random questions that have been sloshing around in my brainpan lately:
1. Does the proliferation of fandom-specific newsletters mean there's less need for fic-communities? (I'm thinking of comms as fic-posting platforms here, rather than niche outlets for 'ship cliques and the like.)
2. If an ensemble has a canon queer character - or a couple
(
Read more... )
Comments 76
2. *stuffs fist in mouth*
3. I don't know the answer, but I have sticky buns?
Reply
2. But I wanna knooooooooooooow, damn it.
3. *grabby hands!*
Reply
2. Okay, it's like this - if the desire not to slash the other characters is because you love the canon couple so much, that's one thing. But if it's because the canon couple has "ruined" other options because you are either just that unimaginative or just that dedicated to using queer characters on your own terms, then. Well.
3. They're super-yummy.
I am reading the first issue of Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane, and I am loving the art.
Reply
2. Yep. I'm still wrapping my head around the latter and failing miserably.
3. *envies*
YAY! The art's wonderful; it reminds me of Ariel Schrag, if she did color, heteronrmative mainstream comics, that is. :)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
2. Good point - I'm fond of *some* canon pairings, but I'm usually looking elsewhere. I've been wondering if a canon queer couple sucks up the (perception of) slash potential, but QAF is a great counter-example to that.
Reply
So what is a Sticky Hot?
Reply
Sticky Hot is based on my (mis)perception of Warm Fuzzy, admittedly, so if WF taps the gooey heart of romanticism, SH opens up a freeway to the id. I'm basing this solely on the difference kinds of feedback I've gotten lately - I posted a truly libidinal pornlet the same week I posted a CP, highly crafted story, and the responses are strikingly different. And, of course, it's all about me.
Reply
The thing with metabib is that it really sucks to look for a specific post (even for me), b/c I never remember (and noone else can guess, of course) where I'd put a given post.
This one was tucked away with the characterization, b/c it was an answer of sorts to these two: mmmchelle - Characterization Meta, Again (5-05-05) and mmmchelle - Part the 123rd (5-09-05)
Reply
Thanks so much for the additional links!
(Sticky hot. Totally. I just need to figure out how to divorce the discussion a bit from my own fb experiences. *g*)
Reply
2) Generally speaking there seems to be. For me, no.
3) Sticky and HOT! (Have you read the canon I'm quoting? It made me love Devin Grayson.)
4) *glomp*
Reply
2. I would expect nothing less of you. <3
3. OF COURSE! Oh, Dick.
4. *mwah*
Reply
2. That depends very strongly on the writers' attitude toward canon, because you gain people who sign up for the same-sex canon ships who wouldn't write about X/Y before because "that's not canon." However, you then lose people (I, I admit, am one of them) who think of canon ships as kinda boring.
It also has a lot to do with attitudes toward OCs. One way to say, "Gee, my show doesn't do very well with CoC" would, of course, to write interesting OCoC, but that's not going to be an option for writers who say "I'm in this fandom because I'm interested in the central characters." And another use for OCs is "Gee, I think Character L needs a boyfriend/girlfriend, but nobody in canon really works."
Reply
2. you then lose people (I, I admit, am one of them) who think of canon ships as kinda boring. Right, but say that Zoe/Wash was a queer couple (Zack/Wash?) - you might not write them, because canon ship = boring for you, but would it, as a queer ship, prevent (inhibit?) you from slashing Mal and Simon or another set of guys?
I hadn't thought of OCs here, but you make a lot of sense. Plus, I like saying OCoC aloud. *g*
Reply
Reply
I second that. Most people that compile these newsletters look in comms, not individual journals because that would take too long and be maddening. I belong to several fic comms so that I can post fic there, but none of those comms appear on my friends list--instead I look at the SPN newsletter.
Reply
Leave a comment