Some fun observations

Apr 29, 2007 05:34


...that, perhaps, aren't as fun as they should be.

1. I've always thought that manga was biased because every time a boy and girl are set to matriculate (especially from junior high school); the boy is usually pegged as the smarter one. He is also usually the one who gives up a chance at a great high school to remain beside the girl he loves. ( Read more... )

writing, fanfiction, ygo, lj, pseudo-intellectual, lj friends, manga, the orient, seto/anzu

Leave a comment

praiseofshadows April 29 2007, 23:31:00 UTC
I mean, the generalization is huge and I'm sure there are exceptions to both rules but maybe this is cultural? Is it the general consensus in the Orient that males are smarter than females versus the western trend of girls being smarter (or at least working harder at academics)? I'm actually wondering if has more to do with the fact that love stories in manga are usually written for girls, and girls (as a general rule) want boys that are smarter than them (which then begs the question: what if all those smarter boys want smarter girls, too? XDDDD). I mean, that's what you're always told to aim set your cap for: a boy smarter than you with a better career than you, and of course, taller than you (though if you can get the first two, you can xnay the third XD).

Also, I've never thought there was a western trend of girls being smarter -- I've always thought of it as the girl working harder because primary/secondary educations are biased in favour of the boy which sucks but that eventually evens out with the huge drop-out rate of boys in university XDDDD

And also, I'm totally with you on fic that's going nowhere *eyes files suspiciously* I think I've lost plot around the same time I lost my favourite thumb ring...aieee! XDDD

Also, YAY! for "As I Please" ♥

Reply

geniusgirl April 30 2007, 14:41:44 UTC
It probably does have more to do with target audience rather than any sort of consensus but you see, this here is where I think it becomes cultural: girls (as a general rule) want boys that are smarter than them [...] I mean, that's what you're always told to aim set your cap for: a boy smarter than you with a better career than you, and of course, taller than you (though if you can get the first two, you can xnay the third XD).

For as long as I can remember, neither myself mor anyone else I know never been told that (though I admit to being attracted to people who are either my intellectual equal or better simply because they tend to get my sense of humour more). But this may have more to do with the fact that in the Caribbean, it's everybody sink of swim (we're a bit cynical, it's true) and the fact that most girls are fiercely independent to the point that we actually do have this nasty habit of looking down our noses are women who depend on men for their living, of course, for their happiness and sexual fulfillment, sure XDDD (Or it could just be because marriage is on the decline in Caricom >.>)

And again, the whole biased school system is dependent on which school system you find yourself in. But I think girls do tend to work harder because we've inherited (whether consciously or not) a very feminist towards education and careers here in the west. There are very few girls in this hemisphere whose ambition in life is "to be a bride" (quote, don't know from where XD).

But yeah, enough on feminism because that takes a lot of effort to talk about and I'm lazy XD

I'm going to make that fic go somehwere or at the very least write shower!sex XDDD

Reply

geniusgirl April 30 2007, 14:44:31 UTC
And, of course, I meant, "Never, for as long as I can remember, have I or anyone I've known ever been told that."

Yeah... -_-

Reply

OMG -- comment too long for LJ XD (1st part) praiseofshadows May 1 2007, 15:20:45 UTC
but you see, this here is where I think it becomes cultural: .... For as long as I can remember, neither myself mor anyone else I know never been told that

I never considered it wasn't cultural. I just thought you were looking at the cultural issue a bit too narrowly.

It's not so much as being told; it's the entire social imaginary that we live in (and construct) on a daily basis. (And yes, I am a complete geek for Benedict Anderson, Charles Taylor, and Michel Foucault). It's the fact that people are generally taken aback by a tall woman married to a short man. It's the way romance novels usually involve set-ups about a the cynical rich man falling for the poor girl with a heart of gold. About how a wild girl is finally "tamed" by the right man. (and these examples are just two of many that are troubling in a genre written by and for women). The fact that women's beach volleyball teams at the Olympics were forced into bikinis while their male counterparts wore normal swimming trunks. It's all the unspoken codes of society that make up our everyday interactions.

And yes, it is cultural, but it's cultural in the sense that feminism is cultural: that while it exists, it coincides uneasily with the pre-1968 status quo. It exists in some places and not in others. There are different forms of it: militant, third generation, anti!feminist women who would still balk if they were told they had to stay home and clean, they would tell you that they do it because they want to. It exists in the fact that while I've never been told that girls do more poorly in math than boys, I never went beyond anything more complicated than one-variable calculus. It exists in the fact that men who take time off to be house-husbands are considered 1) to be pedophiles 2) drunkards and 3) bad people to hire when they try to re-enter the work force while woman have no such issue. It exists in the fact that woman are expected to have both careers and be wonderful 1950s mothers. While men are expected to be just as stoic and removed from family life as their 1950s counterparts.

What is said isn't nearly as important as what isn't said. (Phatic communication FTW! And here I thought I learnt nothing in anthro XD)

To single out the Caribbean is to remove it from the larger context and reify it into some sort of bastion of one part of the social imaginary. And that doesn't deal with the larger problem. It's like claiming that glass ceilings only exist in women's minds or that minorities are all fine in the US now because there is AA. Or that there isn't racism or sexism in Europe which is such a lie that it makes me sick when my Dutch friends try and tell me that and then are puzzled when I take them to task for saying nasty things about the Turks but that's a rant for another day XD.

Which is why I have problem with you saying:

And again, the whole biased school system is dependent on which school system you find yourself in. But I think girls do tend to work harder because we've inherited (whether consciously or not) a very feminist towards education and careers here in the west. There are very few girls in this hemisphere whose ambition in life is "to be a bride" (quote, don't know from where XD).

Because that's patently false from the images projected onto the generic Western woman by modern, Western culture. Ask yourself, how are women generally portrayed in popular culture. What popular culture generally focuses on when it looks at famous women. Just look at the recent debate about Brittney Spears. She is condemned for being a horrible mother, she is condemned for not wearing underwear. She is basically branded a whore by the media. And what about her (ex)husband? He is arguably one-half of the reason for her breakdown, but what does the media focus on? Her. (One could argue that this too is sexism: because he was a man married to a far more famous woman, he is considered a non-entity, not a real man because he was not her level. He was a man who married "up" and that's not the cultural norm).

Reply

Re: OMG -- comment too long for LJ XD (2nd part) praiseofshadows May 1 2007, 15:23:46 UTC
Think of all the shows that portray the single life: men are shown out to have a good time, women are shown going on endless dates looking for "the one." Sex and the City which people always cite as liberating for women is incredibly misogynistic as it shows women craving the sex men provide. As if they cannot be fully formed individuals without a man. Think of how those women are never shown actually doing their jobs: instead they wear beautiful clothes and high-heels (and really, don't get me started on high-heels and how they -- and every other shoe that are ever fetishized, such as foot-binding in China -- restrict women's movement).

And I have a real problem with you saying that it's no longer any girl's ambition to be a bride. Just as I would have a problem with anyone telling me that men no longer have ambition to be husbands. There is the idea -- again perpetuated by popular culture (and the European Religious Reformation and then again by the Napoleonic area) that the family is central Western culture. And one might say the same thing about the Tokagawa period. And the late-19th century civil unrest in China (which was, in part, brought on by the fact the family had broken down and there were gangs of wifeless men roaming wild and shut out of proper society).

Some incredibly good books on this subject are: Family Romance of the French Revolution (written by a militant feminist who while praised by her historian colleagues was ostracized by her militant feminist ones, which in itself is worrisome), Idols of Perversity (though that takes the Romantics & later the Victorians to task for continuing Napoleon's family model), & The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law (for the simple fact that it discusses in depth the idea of gays getting married which is perhaps the triumph of dominant family nuclear family model after all).

And school systems are vehicles for this enculturalization. They are ways to disseminate the cultural power, so girls who feel that they have to work harder is actually quite sad and shows the complete non-success of feminism in the West. There should be no reason why a girl must work harder than a boy. There should be no reason that boys are favoured in the classroom (and they are, given the polls conducted on teachers: teachers will admit that they do favour boys more than girls when it comes to grades, attention, and generally considering who is smarter). It's not enough to say "Well, I've inherited a feminist outlook from previous generations so I have to work harder." Because there's such a fallacy in that statement: why should a feminist have to work harder? Why shouldn't she (and any woman, feminist or otherwise) be taken on her own merits?

Reply

Re: OMG -- comment too long for LJ XD (3rd part) praiseofshadows May 1 2007, 15:25:01 UTC
It's like what a (black) boss told her (black) subordinate the other day (before firing her): "People of colour have to be exceptional in the workplace."

Which might just be the most insulting thing that woman has ever said (and I personally can't stand her, so imo she's said quite a lot of other insulting stuff). Does that imply that whites can slack? Or does it imply that it's not enough for blacks to be merely decent at their jobs? And not that I like to spend my time equating race and gender (because there are just as many differences as similarities), but race and gender are both socially constructed roles that people pay lip serve to and yet do not seriously question the social imaginary that they themselves live in and perpetuate. Such as the fact I'm writing about post-modern feminism and yet really, really want to write hot Seto/Anzu pr0n instead of say an Anzu gen piece about her struggles to be a ballet dancer despite the fact she's too short and her boobs are too big. And she's really too old to get signed to a company without a boarding school dance academy background.

But yeah...I think I've used up my serious quota for the year. I blame exam period. XDDDDDD

Reply

Re: OMG -- comment too long for LJ XD (3rd part) geniusgirl May 1 2007, 18:03:46 UTC
This may sound like a cop-out (and in many ways it probably is) but you win. Not in the very crappy internet sense but in the very real way. And I'm hoping that doesn't come off sounding too much like a brush-off because it isn't. I wholly respect your opinions and, honestly, you've pointed out a lot of angles that I wasn't looking at this from. Truthfully, when I made my original observation, I wasn't thinking this far ahead (a lot short-sighted of me, I know, but it was 2:00am).

I would make a longer reply to this but I'm still taking it. (And yes, I am very easily cowed. Also, see observation #2 of the original post *quibbles*) Can I still ♥ you for taking me seriously?

However, it just struck me that this:

It's the way romance novels usually involve set-ups about a the cynical rich man falling for the poor girl with a heart of gold.

...sounds jarringly familiar. Especially considering what we spend our time writing. Though we really don't write it like that (since she's not usually poor). At least, I hope we don't XDDD

Reply

Re: OMG -- comment too long for LJ XD (3rd part) praiseofshadows May 2 2007, 03:44:33 UTC
This may sound like a cop-out Dude, no worries -- I just was avoiding doing homework, and I ♥ gender studies and I realized that my first reply to your post had been way to flippant and that this really was a topic that deserved my serious attention....and, hence, like always the excessive words that turned a comment into a mini-essay. XD. Also, those books? They are teh AWESOME. Seriously. So if you ever are in need of something good to read....totally there XD

Also:

..sounds jarringly familiar. Especially considering what we spend our time writing. Though we really don't write it like that (since she's not usually poor). At least, I hope we don't XDDD

Yes, it does -- but (as Foucault said) being aware of the problem is perhaps all we can actually hope for, as we're so embedded in the problem we really can't escape from it. So I think as long as we're aware of what we're writing and how we're writing it, we're all right.

And really? When it comes right down to it, Seto/Anzu is hawt. ♥ ♥ ♥

Reply


Leave a comment

Up