(Untitled)

Apr 22, 2006 13:02

I was looking down at my fingers today, and I remembered an article I had read a long time ago in "Psychology Today" about index to ring finger ratio affecting the way your brain develops.  The link is here:  http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20050614-000004.html

The article talks about how bio-females generally have ring and index fingers ( Read more... )

health-intersex issues

Leave a comment

4evermore April 22 2006, 17:17:01 UTC
come on, it's just another line of BS. I mean, honestly! who gives a fig how long my fingers are???

Reply

anotherflavor April 22 2006, 17:20:12 UTC
I have to agree with you. It seems kind of silly, and anyway, there are always exceptions even if it were true.

For the record, one of my ring fingers is slightly shorter while the other is slightly longer, so that doesn't help.

Reply

flamesof_ice April 22 2006, 17:28:04 UTC
I know it's not perfect or anything, and it's not a theory I'll really believe in until they get way more evidence behind it, but I was just wondering whether it would even actually apply to this. Thanks anyway.

Reply

scififan151852 April 22 2006, 17:31:34 UTC
one of my ring fingers is slightly shorter while the other is slightly longer

I hear ya.

Reply

icarus_after April 22 2006, 18:37:59 UTC
all that crazy science.... faddish, really.

Reply

flamesof_ice April 22 2006, 19:25:40 UTC
Oh, I've always been a science nerd. This fall, I'm going to UVa to major in Biomedical Engineering, and either get a minor or hopefully a second major in Psychology. The article was kind of a mix of the two topics I really am interested in. I don't mean to force my interests on anyone else, you know? I was just wondering how it worked out for everyone else.

Reply

icarus_after April 22 2006, 19:28:03 UTC
i was being flip re: the above commenter.

i realize that this might need some more data, but responding to it as though it's a meme and saying "who gives a fig" seems to me a display of willful ignorance.

enjoy uva. c'ville is nice.

Reply

flamesof_ice April 22 2006, 22:00:22 UTC
Oh I'm sorry, I thought you were being serious. Sorry to get all defensive on you *sheepish*. And thanks, I can't wait to get there :)

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

icarus_after April 23 2006, 00:40:17 UTC
i'm inclined to say that those of use who believe gender exists and who know that testosterone has a profound effecy on the brain might say that it's not "essentializing," and that gender is not a social/ cultural trait.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

icarus_after April 23 2006, 01:29:37 UTC
men and women are different in ways that are not about culture and socialization. that there are gender differences based on exposure to testosterone is not about culture or society.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

icarus_after April 23 2006, 01:36:00 UTC
how i process emotion and communication is not sex; it is gender. and it isn't cultural.

and, yes, i'd say that there are ways to define "masculine" without cultural context. i think it's about a lot more than, say, a fondness for pants.

Reply

daddysambiguity April 25 2006, 05:48:30 UTC
As a sociology undergrad, I agree with you, by the way. :)

Reply

flamesof_ice April 22 2006, 17:26:47 UTC
*shrug* I just thought it was kind of interesting. Maybe it doesn't mean anything, but if it doesn't, then it doesn't matter. I just wanted to see what other people thought.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up