Meta: Warnings

Aug 25, 2007 16:55

I have some questions about warnings. I read a post where somebody argued that when you post a pairing it is redundant to also classify the story as het or slash ( Read more... )

discussion

Leave a comment

saestina August 25 2007, 16:43:52 UTC
This isn't exactly related to your question, but I'm going to go the other way and say that I'm troubled by the overabundance of warnings and find them to be more of a hindrance than a help, particularly as a writer. Often, I don't particularly want to warn for something like the death of a character, for example; that's giving away a major plot point and sacrificing some of the emotional reaction I'm going for when a character dies suddenly. I feel like if I've given the reader the knowledge that this is a story that deals with serious issues (either through the rating, the summary or both) it shouldn't be incumbent on me to line out exactly what's going to happen that someone may find troubling. I feel the same way as a reader; too many warnings just feel like spoilers to me for what I'm about to read ( ... )

Reply

callmetofu August 25 2007, 16:50:50 UTC
It's a good point.

I usually don't have the problem because my stories often don't have much plot. I have considered putting "sad ending" or "happy ending" labels on it (I write a lot of unhappy endings). Then I quickly feel stupid for doing it.

You can also never know just what will upset somebody. Some people might be really sensitive to animals getting hurt. I read there was a fandom where one character had long hair and people demanded warnings for fic where he cut his hair because it traumatized them so much. There might me things that set somebody off that you never would have considered and you can't really think of everything.

Maybe there should be a label like 'dark' or 'gritty' that signals that character death can happen, but maybe not.

Reply

saestina August 25 2007, 17:07:20 UTC
You can also never know just what will upset somebody.That's true, but I don't really think it should be the responsibility of the writer to ensure that readers don't unknowingly run across anything they might potentially find offensive. That way lies madness, and I think some authors (all present company excepted) overabundant use of warnings already borders on it. The most comprehensive ratings system I've ever seen in mass media is the one that movies and premium channels use. They give a rating with a explanation of how that rating came about, such as MA/R for sexual content and violence. Most fan fiction headers have this level of information without having to resort to numerous specific warnings, and I think that's a perfectly adequate amount of information to supply to an audience for them to be able to make an informed decision about whether to watch/read or not ( ... )

Reply

chanchito_z August 25 2007, 17:06:53 UTC
I think what you're saying is absolutely valid. But the sad thing is that when it comes to fanfic, people don't seem to be able to approach it as they would a book they pulled off a shelf from the library. Readers want to know exactly what they're getting: pairing, exact rating of language, any hint of taboo topics like domestic abuse, child endangerment, rape, death. All things an editor of a novel would never give away on the inside of the jacket cover ( ... )

Reply

callmetofu August 25 2007, 17:12:19 UTC
It's said that we do it because we are afraid of each other.

Maybe one reason why people are more accepting with a real book is because there is a bigger quality control. Not just everybody can write a book. They need to have a certain quality to be sold, they have to invent new characters and a plot that fills a whole book. Maybe that is why we give them more freedom not to warn.

Reply

chanchito_z August 25 2007, 17:19:27 UTC
It is sad, but I think, perhaps it may not exactly be fear. At the heart of sharing one's work, I suppose is the idea that we're sharing a part of ourselves, so we want our stories to be accepted. By facilitating people's reading of our stories we encourage the acceptance. Maybe that's it. I dunno!

And I think the idea that in general, people see fanfic and being not "real" writing is probably a very important aspect of it too. (tho I've read some fanfic that blows a lot of pro novels I've read out of the water that's for certain!) But in general, that seems to be the norm. We can demand more because we expect less. A very good point.

Reply

wanton_erato August 25 2007, 17:07:35 UTC
I completely agree re. the 'character death' warning. I've always found that bizarre. Surely one should be able to tell from the tone of the story whether it is a serious, dramatic story, and then taking that on board, accept that the writer may take you to some troubling places.

And yes, any warnings that are in effect spoilers should not be expected of writers IMO.

As for the people who were upset by the 'hair cutting', if anyone ever whined at me about something like that in a piece I had written, I would be seriously tempted to tell them to just grow up, honestly.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up