Cookbook in the finals!

Oct 23, 2006 18:19

This is the last time I'll be posting about this because hopefully Cookbook will win ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

holyschist October 24 2006, 00:49:31 UTC
I swear I've seen a shareware program almost exactly like that on Apple's downloads page. Organizaed Gourmet is darned similar, aside from Amazon.com integration (do people actually order staple groceries from Amazon?).

Snarky Windows folks: try searching for Windows shareware recipe software. There might be some out there. And believe it or not, but there are a lot of "cool" applications that are Mac- or Unix/Linux-based-OS-only. They're operating systems, not freaking religions.

Reply

autumnmist October 24 2006, 01:36:58 UTC
There are a number of other recipe management apps out there, but they really aren't very good for anything besides recipe management. Seriously, if you've actually tried to use them, to import your recipes, to import recipes from the web (e.g. you can't import, you need to type in manually), you'll find that there is definitely room in the market for something that actually works. There were many mp3 players before the iPod.

Anyway, it's really bizarre, everyone makes such a big deal about the Amazon.com integration when the Cookbook contestant himself doesn't think it is necessarily a top priority.

The big deal with Cookbook is the ease of use, the recipe sharing (RSS feeds for recipes from your favorite blogs??), the meal planning *integrated* with the recipe database and the automated grocery lists.

Reply

holyschist October 24 2006, 02:43:08 UTC
I agree that the other ones aren't great, but importing recipes from the web (stored in a variety of formats) automatically into the database form the program uses is something easy for a designer to talk about and very hard for a programmer to implement. So certainly those other features would be nice, but they're easier said than done. There are real programming reasons a lot of those haven't been done before.

Reply

autumnmist October 24 2006, 02:58:26 UTC
Ah but not if you can get a microformat (microformat.org) going among the foodblogging crew; it's about time that happened anyway. Then recipes are distributed in a standard format for easy importing.

Also the self-contained community of Cookbook users could easily share their recipes with each other (and since they're all in Cookbook already, they're obviously in the same format)--this would be no different from any other social networking-based site in which user-created content is shared among the group to create something of value (e.g. Youtube).

Reply

holyschist October 24 2006, 13:30:51 UTC
IF. And you'd also have to either get all the major food websites doing it too, or build in a whole bunch of formats.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that it's more complicated to implement than it looks.

Reply

sleepingwulf October 24 2006, 02:07:27 UTC
There actually are quite a few of these for windows, some are fairly useless for anything other than managing your recipes but there are some very full featured ones out there as well.

Reply

ankie October 24 2006, 08:43:36 UTC
Do you have a lead for me? A name? :)

Reply

ankie October 24 2006, 08:43:10 UTC
I think the snarky person was a troll :)

I don't have a mac, but not because I'm 'anti' :P Cause, I'm out of puberty. ;) I am happy for all the mac-using folk, because that OS is just darn pretty.

And yes, I will try finding windows shareware recipe software, but last time I looked, it was pretty bad out there :(

Reply


Leave a comment

Up