*edits own userinfo*

May 29, 2007 16:37

Sorry for the spam ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 32

channonyarrow May 30 2007, 00:09:27 UTC
Okay. Fuck me with a chainsaw, but WOW.

Way to be fucking stupid, LJ.

Thank you for posting this, not that I'm happy you have to, but because this is something I did not realise was happening. I guess that I will, without a great deal of pleasure, go post a disclaimer in my journal too. Since fuck knows, I probably have, you know, heroin, or drugs, or homosexuality, or something as an interest.

Reply


dorrie6 May 30 2007, 00:15:12 UTC
Jaci and I created a comm over at GJ to discuss, share info, and hopefully prepare some kind of response. If you're interested: http://www.greatestjournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fandomtossed

Reply

beck_liz May 30 2007, 00:35:33 UTC
Dorrie, is it all right to link to that elsewhere? I've got a post up, and I know other people would be interested.

Reply

dorrie6 May 30 2007, 00:36:33 UTC
Yes! Feel free to spread the word!

Reply


celandineb May 30 2007, 00:16:24 UTC
listing an interest in an illegal activity must be viewed as using LiveJournal to solicit that illegal activity....

As I said over at Femme's, I find this most alarming. I have "gay marriage" listed as an interest -- it's illegal in my state. From what Abuse has been saying, I could, potentially, have my LJ suspended/deleted without warning for my support for equal marriage rights for all.

*headdesk*

But I shall take a bit of a leaf out of your book and add to my general fanfic disclaimer the further disclaimer that this is all fiction and writing about it does not mean I condone it.

Reply

shocolate May 30 2007, 00:28:57 UTC
oooh - may I pinch that disclaimer - it is dead elegant!

Reply

celandineb May 30 2007, 00:31:57 UTC
LOL -- thanks. I was actually rather more wordy in the userinfo disclaimer than I was here.

Pinch by all means!

Reply

shocolate May 30 2007, 00:34:41 UTC
yup - I just checked your user id - that seems much more grown up than I would have managed.

Bastards.

Reply


novembersnow May 30 2007, 00:29:28 UTC
Yes, and yes, and yes. I am so angry about this situation, I don't think I can even be coherent about it. But you've pretty much encapsulated the essential wrongness. And there is, in fact, SO MUCH WRONG.

Reply


akatonbo May 30 2007, 00:29:53 UTC
I'm going to be avoiding this with the longest pole I can find, but I would like to point out, just for the record, that the head of the Abuse Team is a slash author herself.

However, even she has to bow to higher-ups who may have their heads up their asses.

Reply

florahart May 30 2007, 00:33:31 UTC
Oh, sure.

I meant to be saying, that it's not reasonable that the abuse team should be expected (by their higher-ups) to be handling this in this manner. I'll edit to be more clear.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up