Anymore, no one seems to agree who said this first:
http://jaywalker.ca/Jaywalker_Magazine/Columns/Publisher's%20Notes/forget_the_past.htm I know the first time I saw it, it was attributed to Friedrich Nietzsche. But it's an absolute truism, honestly.
Some of the greatest oafs have quoted wonderful things--when Ozzy Osbourne got it right with his
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
It didn't "happen to" Chris Benoit. He chose to kill his wife and child. And men who aren't misogynist assholes who think that their wives and children are property that they can "take with them" when they kill themselves are not going to emulate him.
I'm a stone atheist and I thoroughly reject the idea that evil is some sort of "presence." It's a choice that people make. The religious/"spiritual" idea of it as an invading force is rationalization that enables people not to have to admit that they chose to do something wrong.
If Chris Benoit hadn't been a much-adored athlete, but some random wanker in the news, I wonder how many people would be choking up over him, rather than saying, "Good riddance"? There's another thing - when the fuck did we start believing that sports players were semi-deities? They have specialized physical skills. That's it. Benoit no more deserves our pity than O.J. Simpson did ( ... )
Reply
I actually SAID he made his own choices.
You utterly disembowl your arguments when you don't pay attention to what is being said in the first place. I even made a post some months back telling people if they were incapable of understanding simple English, to just go away.
I'm sure you have some strong opinions, but if you go back and actually READ what I wrote, you'll see most of what you said has nothing to do with my post.
Please withhold your (non-specific)righteous pontifications for your own LJ.
Nechtan
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
He's not my hero and what you appear to be saying in response "to me" is actually your ideas separate from what was written. Do you flame other people's LJs for fun?
There's no point in proving anything to someone who does not pay attention to the words being spoken or written. You will continue to argue from what you THINK I'm saying rather than what I AM saying.
Learn English. It's helpful.
Nechtan
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
['m not sure how mr. lewis' description of evil as a perversion of good might fit into all this, but i like it..]
Reply
Reply
this brings up something i forgot to mention; if you fill yourself with goodness, there's generally less room for evil [and the goodness tends to revolt at the introduction of evil, so it serves a double purpose.*] to do that, though, you must first acknowledge that good and evil exist. lack of distinction and awareness leaves one open for a fall. we don't have the *choice* your first respondents referred to unless there's first something to choose between.
Reply
Absolutely right!!!!
There used to be NO QUESTION of good and evil, but it all became relative and subjective somewhere in the last couple of centuries.
I don't think we did ourselves any favours by blurring the boundaries.
Nechtan :)
Reply
Leave a comment