Regarding Blue Avenger

Oct 27, 2007 16:27

Since the book covers some philisophical issues, I'll accept that this might be deliberate, but still wish to rant about a character's failure of logic.

Dear Omaha Nebraska Brown,

Your brother is in his twenties, mostly illiterate, and currently in prison for shooting a friend to death while drunk. You still think he's an awesome brother and love him nonetheless? Sure, no problem there.

But you've started a mission to prove that he's genetically prone to violence and thus it wasn't his fault.

Er.

This isn't a good thing. What, exactly, would it achieve? I remember watching a video in high school about a guy in prison who was found to be genetically prone to violence -- and denied bail because of it. If your brother is proven to be genetically prone to violence, there would be no benifit. There wouldn't even be a moral advantage, as he was still responsable for killing a friend. Actually, it would indicate a tendancy toward stupid violence -- killing in self defense or turning to crime simply to stay alive is still more reasonable than an illogical killing in a moment of blind rage.

I suppose it's possible that a treatment might be developed for his condition, but genetic therapy is still quite a ways in the future. It's possible he'll never live to see it happen.
Previous post Next post
Up