Wimbledon vs Roger Federer

Jul 01, 2010 08:47

* * * *

As usual, Dootsiez has put virtual pen to paper and absolutley nailed my feelings on Roger/Wimbley. Find it here.

I admit that I didn't want Roger to win Wimbledon. But I did want another epic Rafa/Roger final, with Rafa winning. So, Vamos Rafa!


Read more... )

2010: wimbledon, roger

Leave a comment

pilaposer July 1 2010, 20:54:07 UTC
As you can probably guess, I don't entirely agree with Dootsiez. Although I agree that the Rafa hating Fed fans need to shut up and stop making subtle (Fed's *never* taken a med time out, with the unsaid part being that Rafa exploits MTOs to his advantage) and not-so-subtle (Rafa complains about injuries *all* the time) digs at Rafa all over the internet ( ... )

Reply

mtmed9273 July 10 2010, 05:51:05 UTC
many players.nadal. excuse for injury. It is always possible.

But, the Roger's excuse is impossible.
Roger is human. He also has the slump.

When Roger is defeated. player's eulogy always. Influence of the Roger's sickness and injury. It doesn't change the evaluation.

Therefore, Roger's fan protects him. It is natural feelings of the fan.

Roger's sickness and injury. MONO. And, disease of lungs.

suffers an illness. He has obviously become weak play. The decrease continues.

And, the chronic injury. Back. Waist. In addition, the foot is injury from the tournament of Halle. He was defeated at Lleyton. But,he was laughing.

foot was injured in Halle. It is fact

Reply

fedal_fangirl July 10 2010, 17:01:26 UTC
This is totally off topic, and PLEASE PLEASE I hope you don't take offense... but I find your English to be totally adorable. What is your native language? I always envy anyone who has the ability to speak other languages. XD

Reply

mtmed9273 July 11 2010, 05:49:21 UTC
I am not good at English.

I'm sorry ^^;

Reply

mtmed9273 July 11 2010, 05:56:22 UTC
MTO of Rafa should have the doubt. He buys time always uselessly. A cheap Putting and pull.
vomits saliva. many players are made to wait. Always exaggerated overpowering

Roger also. part of not good.
But, I heard it many times.tired

All players have it. Part of not good

Roger's fan, it is understood.
many fans of the player are understood.

The criticism to Roger is always exaggerated.
He has been speaking since the time of Halle. Back. Waist. injury of foot

Nevertheless,

It like hears it heard for the first time. It is really a surprise.

Not seriously treated, no matter there is very a cause of the slump.

The same as it from the time of the Roger heyday.

Reply

elbow3 July 11 2010, 17:01:46 UTC
I'll try to settle down the nerves here. After all, we're all fans of the pair of them, no ?
Maybe, we could just listen to what Rafa has to say about Roger in his PC during wimbledon 2010 :

"To have a player as complete as Roger always in front of you, is a stimulus to keep on improving day after day,"
says Rafa. "We both give it all on the court, but once you are off the court it is all over. It is a game, and
that is all. There are things in life that are more important. We are both normal people and I have always got on
brilliantly with Roger."

For anyone of you who would have doubts about how well those two get along, the words of Rafa above, proves you wrong :)

Reply

rogandraf July 11 2010, 20:57:51 UTC
I wish that Roger and Rafa's fans could get along as well as the two of them. I'm not talking about people here, but people on the tennis message boards, RF.com (which I think Roger needs to scrap and just start over with a no bashing rule), newspaper comment sectinos, etc.

Reply

rogandraf July 11 2010, 20:58:31 UTC
sections, not sectinos! LOL!

Reply

rogandraf July 11 2010, 00:09:03 UTC
I hope you are not offended. I was talking about the mean Federer fans, not the nice ones. :) I don't believe that Roger lies about his injuries, but certain of his fans *always* bring up illnesses and injuries of Roger whenever he loses. They can never admit that Rafa (or anyone else, for that matter) beat a fully healthy Roger. To those people--who are anti-Rafa to a sick degree, IMO--none of Rafa's wins over Roger count for some reason or another, whether there is actual proof or not ( ... )

Reply

mtmed9273 July 11 2010, 07:07:59 UTC
hello. not offended^^

I am Roger's fan from 2004.
By the way, His back and waist are chronic injured since 2004. In 2005, the ankle injured, too. In the memory

However, after the sickness, It has really become weak. The age, too.

It is continuation of the slump now. The injury, too.
It is painful time for Roger's fan.

And, Roger's Do. or doesn't do. It is always treated in the exaggeration.

But, Other players. The same thing. Do, or doesn't do.
Not matter it. always, it is disgusted. haha

Reply

rogandraf July 11 2010, 21:02:00 UTC
I'm glad that you are not offended. I know that you are Roger's fan. I am too. Sometimes I want to knock some sense into him, but I am still his fan. :)

I do get a little mouthy (or fingertippy) and opinionated at times, as poor Fedal Fangirl knows. :)

Reply

fedal_fangirl July 10 2010, 17:06:45 UTC
Rafa and Roger are such a great contrast. I think that Rafa is much more expressive of his emotions and he seems very genuine in his pressers. Whether he wins or loses, you always know how he feels about it. And he always gives credit to his opponent.

Roger, on the other hand, is not so gracious at losing. He makes it hard to be a Fed fan sometimes. XD

Reply

rogandraf July 11 2010, 00:10:27 UTC
Agreed. :)

Reply

mtmed9273 July 11 2010, 06:01:06 UTC
MTO of Rafa, should have the doubt. He buys time always uselessly. A cheap Putting and pull.
vomits saliva. Always exaggerated overpowering

Roger also. part of not good.
But, I heard it many times.tired

All players have it. Part of not good
Roger's fan, it is understood.
many fans of the player are understood.

The criticism to Roger is always exaggerated.
He has been speaking since the time of Halle. Back. Waist. injury of foot

Nevertheless,

It like hears it heard for the first time. It is really a surprise.

never seriously treated, no matter there is very a cause of the slump.

The same as it from the time of the Roger heyday.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up