[ SECRET POST #667 ]

Nov 02, 2008 17:14


⌈ Secret Post #667 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.
Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 345

technophile November 2 2008, 22:16:39 UTC
Name the fandom. And repeats, etc.

Reply

135 spacemonkeyluvn November 2 2008, 22:38:51 UTC
Junjou Romantica ♥

Reply

trompelol November 2 2008, 23:11:58 UTC
Putting in a request for 138. *_*

Reply

tamsin_m November 4 2008, 19:21:13 UTC
I think it's Dr Franken Stein from Soul Eater.

Reply


126 itsumademo1139 November 2 2008, 22:18:34 UTC
I think I do now after the crisis they are going through together atm lol.

Woo almost first post xD.

Reply

Re: 126 itsumademo1139 November 3 2008, 23:05:54 UTC
I didn't really see it before, but now I totally do. And if someone writes fic I'll love them forever.

Reply


#126 saintmaverick November 2 2008, 22:19:07 UTC
YOU ARE AWESOME!

Reply

Re: #126 saintmaverick November 3 2008, 23:06:28 UTC
WHY THANK YOU!

Reply


leinyan November 2 2008, 22:20:10 UTC
152. I don't see it either.

Reply

vexingthoughts November 3 2008, 00:13:25 UTC
Ditto. Just because it's not a traditional friendship doesn't mean its sexual tension or whatever fandom sees it as...

Reply

leinyan November 3 2008, 00:27:43 UTC
The two of them could never have a "traditional" friendship because of what their personalities are like, but that doesn't mean that their friendship could ever develop into something else. I do believe that there are many people, in any fandom, who'll ship male characters together just for the sake of shipping, or they think it's hot~ instead of they believe there could be a basis for something.

Reply

beandelphiki November 3 2008, 06:13:05 UTC
But House/Wilson is, uh, really not one of those "just because it's hot" ships. It's the most important relationship on the show, for pete's sake - that's not a ship based on nothing. (House/Chase, now - THAT'S pretty much just for the hot.)

You're perfectly welcome to read them as platonic (god knows they're going to stay that way, canonically); but if you really can't see where some people might ship them, well. I don't think that's because the slashers are seeing things. (We're not. The writers have admitted the subtext is intentional, even if it isn't going anywhere.) I would think it's because your interpretation of the canon is too rigid to allow for other ways of reading it.

Reply


115 skysailing November 2 2008, 22:20:36 UTC
Dear god, same.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up