(Untitled)

[drake_da_dragon]

Even with so many thinsg I've come to understand I still don't understand what I want. The answer is near though, I can feel it. It's liek I'm sitting just outside the answer to my problems... There's a conclusion, an explanation for everythign I've been feelign for years, and what to do. It's near but just out of reach

Comments

[geddarkstorm]

Wow, rarely I follow someone's comment on someone else's journal back to their own, but your's peaked my curiosity (well... truthfully in combination with the dragon icon and your name, eh heh ^^;), so I hope it isn't intruding, rude, or overly bold of me to both have posted that reply to your comment on Mera's journal and post one here. I suppose, I'm an unfortuante sucker for bringing in my own thoughts when and if I feel they can be of some comparison value or counter balance... Which may not be often, or ever, but who knows, eh heh.

ANYWAYS, I must say, it is impossible to analyze an individual. People are the same as electrons, trying to analyze them, just like trying to analyze an electron, will cause them to "move", their possition and nature changed by the very act of analyzation and nothing can truly be found out. I know from myself, trying to be analyze only creates great levels of annoyance and completely changes my personality, ontop of the fact that any other mind evaluating a mind will always lead to a completely subjective, perspective skewed, result, and there can never be an objective way for minds to analyze minds. You can kinda get a jist, maybe understand a certain thing a little better... but it's still so vauge and lucrative and totally situationally dependant.

I hate judgementalism of individuals... and I do so hope they stop trying to analyze you, as it'll only make everyone upset in the long run.

Hoho, sorry for rambling So much in both places, I'm in a very thoughtful mood for some reason tonight.

[drake_da_dragon]

You're right in that analyzing another for the most part doesn't work, although it is like anything in existance "possible", just not exactly easily, or probable that the answer is correct (oh for the record some analysis on electrons has been done; which involve splitting them to find out what made them move: quarks. I'm not up on full details though).

However it's a moot point, humans do it all the time, in an attempt to justify, classify and understand. By performing their own biased analysis they come to an understanding they can accept with a minimum of accomodation of their schemas.

[geddarkstorm]

Quite true is that. Intergrating views is something difficult for most people, so anything out of the ordinary typically gets thrown in the "box", no matter how unfitting that is; especially other people.

Insights into things are rather handy in many cases. People all have the potential for growth and betterment, I believe, even if few actually apply themselves to it at times. Humanity is a strange, strange subject with very little sense to it all in some areas. Humans can do so much, but usually don't, simple due to convenience?

(And yeah, using partical accellerators you can get a great look at the compossition of even quarks. I was thinking about the work done with electorn microscopes and other instruments to try to detail the movement of electrons and understand their relations in bonds and such. It's facinating stuff, but nigh impossible to actually look at an electron as we can atoms as the very act of looking changes their energy states and locations to everyone's frustrations. I think they did do something that gave them a look at one for the most infintesimal of a moment using magnents, but it's been awhile since the talk in organic chem about it all)