Yes, because when your husband text messages you a sappy line, all of the problems don't need communication.

I say meta because, apparently she [according to OP, evil scheming woman] is in the polyamory community.

This is all sorts of communication fuck up.

I totally thought your snark was funny but you didn't do it (still haven't figured out why) so I did it for you? Isn't that great?!

*facepalm*

-Ren

For those of you not in the SF Bay Area (or who don't listen to KQED in the morning), you may find this interesting:

http://www.kqed.org/epArchive/R902021000

'twould be a kindness if people who linked to locked posts put some sort of indicator (e.g. [locked]) after the link, to save nonsubscribers a click.

The official policy of this community on friends-locking is ( Read more... )

I thought the community name was dot_poly_snark, not dotjumptheshark.

I have many prior relationships under my belt, 1 of wzzzxn bnbbnnnnnnnnnn nnnnZhich I could re-explore

My poly decoder ring totally failed me here. Have they changed the code book without telling me? Is the new code based on the Voynich Manuscript or the Necronomicon?

Why do you assume anyone cares about this?

Two new tags for your snarking pleasure:
tocotoxic
polyamory bingo