Leave a comment

Comments 4

As I said in reposnse to the post to SPO (I didn't want to deprive y'all DPS members of my wisdom!) dazeydevyne August 21 2006, 23:20:36 UTC
I mostly agree with you, but one tiny par tof a sentence made me go 0__o ( ... )

Reply

Re: As I said in reposnse to the post to SPO (I didn't want to deprive y'all DPS members of my wisdo into_focus August 22 2006, 01:46:21 UTC
Honestly, I have no idea what that firt part is about. When I read that, I was kind of confused by it. All I can think of is, my dog got in a fight with another male dog (both on leashes) and I had to un-clip the leesh to untangle thema and get them apart. That might be a stretch from what happened since it wasn't well explained. Either way though, his dog should have been confined or else it wouldn't have occured (at least I'm hoping that how its looked at in court).
And I was waiting for someone to mention this! Why only pitties when there were two ZOMG LEATHAL WEAPONS (um, opposing breeds) involved. Seriously, it almost sounds like a setup since this man has been lobbying for a pit band before said incident.

Reply

Re: As I said in reposnse to the post to SPO (I didn't want to deprive y'all DPS members of my wisdo xxdevixx August 22 2006, 01:54:17 UTC
I totally thought set up when I read that too.

Reply

Re: As I said in reposnse to the post to SPO (I didn't want to deprive y'all DPS members of my wisdo opal_pink August 23 2006, 04:13:12 UTC
"and that at one point she unleashed Bertie, and Winston and Bertie began "antagonizing each other" until Snyder separated them"

That part sounds like it could be either a bold-faced lie or it could be that the leashed dog momentarily escaped from its owner in the commotion (i.e. the leash was dropped for a minute). I do not believe that the owner who had the dogs on leash was deliberately negligent in this case.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up