"Cuidam Alicui et Suis Amicis"
"To a Certain Someone and Her Friends"
First, let me allow Bugs to say this to you:
Click to view
Well, actually, I do not like war, but it looks like someone decided to turn on me.
Who is it? Sonia Leong:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Leong http://www.fyredrake.net/ Take a look at Sonia's latest post in her LJ:
Two
(
Read more... )
If in your opinion you're no objectifying her but treating her as a real person, then maybe we've hit on the real problem: to you, this is just the way men relate to women. What you're doing to Sonia is just what women are for, to you. At least the good looking ones.
And you know what? I haven't read any of her posts. I'm not her friend or her fan. I read this post of yours and it's the creepiest thing I've seen in months.
Reply
Reply
You or he could make a case that he's within his rights in being a creep. Doesn't change the fact that he is.
Reply
Reply
The thing that you're missing is that "perv" is not just regurgitation of a meme. It's an honest reaction to his conduct. On this post alone. I could show this post--with none of Sonia's posts framing it--to any number of people and get the same reaction. That, in fact, is how I came to the discussion. I was linked directly here by somebody who thought I'd find it interesting, and my reaction is that this guy is a grade A perv and a creep.
Claiming that it's anybody's fault but his because the parties injured by his perviness (Sonia and her husband) didn't ask him to stop doing it in the right way is... farcical.
He shouldn't have done it in the first place, but given that he did, his conduct at every stage since then has been reprehensible.
True, the response from Sonia and her husband and the internet has been out of proportion, but a response proportionate to the offense would violate several laws and his right to due process.
Reply
Reply
I know I didn't exactly come across well in it - my first derisary (sp?) post was made just after I'd got home from work and was feeling rather crappy for personal reasons.
The whole thing does, however, appear to have been blown out of all proportion. It's not LJ drama exclusively though - this sort of over-reaction, rallying of the troops, attacking the person rather than their actions, spreading gossip, commenting on comments instead of getting the facts and generally being uncivilized was also to be found on Usenet too.
It seems that whenever two or three are gathered together, they shall bitch and moan - the internet has just given them more chance to do it, quicker, more publicly and with much nastier results.
I stand by my earlier comment - "there's nowt as queer as folk".
Reply
My comments weren't just about this thread but all of them I've seen. There are many who seem to simply be regurgitating the "perv" comment without actually doing the footwork and seeing how this all went down. Because of the campaign in motion only one side was being presented and many of the people doing so neglected to mention certain facts or took certain things out of context.
As dumb as all of this has been I think I've had my fill of entertainment for the night. I'll no doubt wake up to much more of this drama later. :)
Reply
I have no doubt someone will point out that these errors invalidates my entire argument (yet will also PROVE my "this is stupid" argument at the same time! Hah! Catch 22, sucka!).
I really wish editing comments was allowed for cases like this. Hulu has the same damn problem.
Reply
I do have more to say but I'll wait to see where this goes first, if anywhere. :)
Reply
"I point this out not to defend or condemn the text made in that LiveJournal post (because honestly, I care so little about all of this beyond making fun of dumb comments. Re: Melissa's LJ's comments)."
I meant the replies in the comments section, not Melissa's comments.
Big diff right there. :)
Reply
Leave a comment